The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reversal of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients
Abstract
This is a metaanalysis of all available studies as of December 1990 that have evaluated the effect of antihypertensive pharmacologic therapy on left ventricular structure examined by echocardiography. We applied preset inclusion criteria to the analysis. A total of 109 studies comprising 2357 patients (28% previously untreated) with an average age of 49 years (range 30 to 71) were included. Overall left ventricular mass (LVM) was reduced by 11.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.1 to 13.7] in parallel with a reduction of mean arterial pressure of 14.9% (CI 14 to 15.8). To differentiate between first-line therapies and to adjust for differences between studies, we performed ANCOVA. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors reduced LVM by 15% (CI 9.9 to 20.1), beta-blockers by 8% (CI 4.8 to 11.2), calcium antagonists by 8.5% (CI 5.1 to 11.8), and diuretics by 11.3% (CI 5.6 to 17). When we calculated LVM using the same formula for all studies the absolute reductions in grams were 44.7 g with ACE inhibitors, 22.8 g with beta-blockers, 26.9 g with calcium antagonists, and 21.4 g with diuretics. Except for diuretics, all therapies mainly affected wall thickness, while diuretics predominantly reduced ventricular diameter. In conclusion, this metaanalysis shows that ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, and calcium antagonists all reduce LVM by reversing wall hypertrophy, and that the effect is most pronounced with ACE inhibitors. Conversely, diuretics reduce LVM mainly through a reduction of left ventricular volume. Based on these data, we hypothesize that ACE inhibitors are more effective than other first-line therapies in reducing LVM. However, this theory and its possible prognostic implications need to be evaluated in controlled prospective trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dahlöf, B., Devereux, R. B., Kjeldsen, S. E., Julius, S., Beevers, G., de Faire, U., Fyhrquist, F., Ibsen, H., Kristiansson, K., Lederballe-Pedersen, O., et al. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08089-3 · Cited by 5,407
Self-citationLeft Ventricular Hypertrophy: Pathogenesis, Detection, and Prognosis
Lorell, B. H., & Carabello, B. A. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.102.4.470 · Cited by 1,232
Wing, L. M. H., Reid, C. M., Ryan, P., Beilin, L. J., Brown, M. A., Jennings, G. L. R., Johnston, C. I., McNeil, J. J., Macdonald, G. J., Marley, J. E., et al. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021716 · Cited by 1,130
Prognostic Significance of Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Patients
Perticone, F., Ceravolo, R., Pujia, A., Ventura, G., Iacopino, S., Scozzafava, A., Ferraro, A., Chello, M., Mastroroberto, P., Verdecchia, P., et al. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.104.2.191 · Cited by 1,059
Levin, A., Singer, J., Thompson, C. R., Ross, H., & Lewis, M. (1996) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90357-1 · Cited by 709
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahlöf, B., Pennert, K., & Hansson, L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Hypertension
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-110
- ISSN
- 0895-7061 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7225
- OpenAlex
- W1769893219
- Cited by
- 925
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversal of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ajh/5.2.95
- The paper
- Dahlöf, B., Pennert, K., & Hansson, L. (1992). Reversal of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Hypertensive Patients. American Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/5.2.95
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.