Cited by 90Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Medications for management of opioid use disorder

Koehl, Jennifer L, Zimmerman, David E, Bridgeman, Patrick J·2019·American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy

Abstract

Purpose: The use of buprenorphine, methadone, and long-acting naltrexone for treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) is discussed, including a review of current literature detailing treatment approaches and action steps to optimize treatment in acute care and office-based settings. Summary: The U.S. epidemic of opioid-related deaths has been driven by misuse of prescription opioids and, increasingly, illicit drugs such as heroin, fentanyl, and fentanyl analogs, necessitating a refocusing of treatment efforts on expanding access to life-saving, evidence-based OUD pharmacotherapy. Inpatient treatment of opioid withdrawal includes acute symptom control through a combination of nonopioid medications and long-term pharmacotherapy to lessen opioid craving and facilitate stabilization and recovery. Methadone and buprenorphine reduce opioid craving, increase treatment retention, reduce illicit opioid use, and increase overall survival. Buprenorphine has logistical advantages over methadone, such as greater flexibility of treatment setting and less risk of adverse effects. Studies have shown the efficacy of long-acting injectable naltrexone to be comparable to that of buprenorphine if patients are detoxified prior to initiation of therapy; however, patients with active OUD are often not able to complete the week-long period of opioid abstinence needed prior to initiation of naltrexone injections. Although buprenorphine is preferred by many patients and can be prescribed in office-based settings, there remains a paucity of physicians certified to prescribe it. Conclusion: Buprenorphine has become the medication of choice for many patients with OUD, but its use is limited by the low number of physicians certified to prescribe the agent. Other agents studied for treatment of OUD include methadone and naltrexone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajhp/zxz105

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koehl, J. L., Zimmerman, D. E., & Bridgeman, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Duquesne University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Koehl, Jennifer L
Venue
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
Published
2019-07-18
Volume
76
Issue
15
Pages
1097-1103
ISSN
  • 1079-2082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-2900
OpenAlex
W2963093289
Cited by
90
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
opioid use disorder, buprenorphine, methadone, opioid withdrawal, opioid craving, office-based opioid treatment, opioid epidemic, opioid-related deaths, treatment retention
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Buprenorphine, Humans, Methadone, Naltrexone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Drug Prescriptions, Evidence-Based Medicine, Opiate Substitution Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review