Cited by 49Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsMental Health Treatment and Access

Alcohol consumption and risky drinking patterns in Malaysia: findings from NHMS 2011

Mutalip, Mohd Hatta B. Abdul, Kamarudin, Rozanim Bt., Manickam, Mala, Abd Hamid, Hamizatul Akmal Bt., Saari, Riyanti Bt.·2014·Alcohol and Alcoholism

Abstract

AIMS: To identify the characteristics of current drinker and risky alcohol-drinking pattern by profiles in Malaysia. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2011. It was a cross-sectional population-based with two stages stratified random sampling design. A validated Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test Malay questionnaire was used to assess the alcohol consumption and its alcohol related harms. Analysis of complex survey data using Stata Version 12 was done for descriptive analysis on alcohol use and risky drinking by socio-demography profiles. Logistic regression analysis was used to measure the association of risky drinking status with the socio-demography characteristics. RESULTS: The prevalence of current alcohol use was 11.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.5, 12.7], among them 23.6% (95% CI: 21.0, 26.4) practiced risky drinking. The onset for alcohol drinking was 21 years old (standard deviation 7.44) and majority preferred Beer. Males significantly consumed more alcohol and practiced risky drinking. Current alcohol use was more prevalent among urbanites, Chinese, those with high household income, and high education. Conversely, risky drinking was more prevalent among rural drinkers, Bumiputera Sabah and Sarawak, low education and low household income. The estimated odds of risky drinking increased by a factor of 3.5 among Males while a factor of 2.7 among Bumiputera Sabah and Sarawak. Education status and household income was not a significant predictor to risky drinking. CONCLUSION: There was an inverse drinking pattern between current drinker and risky drinking by the socio-demography profiles. Initiating early screening and focused intervention might avert further alcohol related harms and dependence among the risky drinkers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/alcalc/agu042

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Mutalip, M. H. B. A., Kamarudin, R. B., Manickam, M., Abd Hamid, H. A. B., & Saari, R. B.
Affiliations
Ministry of Health (MY)
Venue
Alcohol and Alcoholism
Published
2014-07-11
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
593-599
ISSN
  • 0735-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3502
OpenAlex
W2100091798
Cited by
49
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
alcohol consumption, hazardous drinking, alcohol use prevalence, socio-demographic profile, Bumiputera, ethnic differences, urban-rural differences, household income, educational attainment, gender differences, alcohol-related harm, Malaysia
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Consumer Behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Malaysia, Male, Risk-Taking, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review