Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attention and perceptual content

Nanay, B.·2010·Analysis

Abstract

Intentionalism is the view according to which the phenomenal character of an experience supervenes on the content of this experience. There are many versions of intentionalism, but I will focus on intentionalism about specific sense modalities: the claim that the phenomenal character of our perceptual experiences supervenes on the content of these perceptual experiences.1 There has been a recent flood of counter-examples against intentionalism, which all, in one way or another, have to do with attention. They all have the same structure: two perceptual experiences have the same content, but they have different phenomenal character because our attention is different in the two cases. As David Chalmers says, ‘the most plausible potential cases of phenomenally distinct visual experiences with the same representational content involve differences in attention’ (Chalmers 2004: 161). The claim is that as in these examples two perceptual experiences have the same content and yet they have different phenomenal character, intentionalism is false: the phenomenal character of perceptual experiences does not supervene on the content of this experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/analys/anp165

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Nanay, B.
Venue
Analysis
Published
2009-12-18
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
263-270
ISSN
  • 0003-2638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8284
OpenAlex
W2095223008
Cited by
196
References
1
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attention and perceptual content. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/analys/anp165
The paper
Nanay, B. (2010). Attention and perceptual content. Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anp165

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.