The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unconscious perceptual justification*
Open accessAbstract
Perceptual experiences justify beliefs. A perceptual experience of a dog justifies the belief that there is a dog present. But there is much evidence that perceptual states can occur without being conscious, as in experiments involving masked priming. Do unconscious perceptual states provide justification as well? The answer depends on one’s theory of justification. While most varieties of externalism seem compatible with unconscious perceptual justification, several theories have recently afforded to consciousness a special role in perceptual justification. We argue that such views face a dilemma: either consciousness should be understood in functionalist terms, in which case our best current theories of consciousness do not seem to imbue consciousness with any special epistemic features, or it should not, in which case it is mysterious why only conscious states are justificatory. We conclude that unconscious perceptual justification is quite plausible.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“although this negative affective state may or may not be something the subject is aware of (Lieberman et al., 2001 and see also Winkielman & Berridge, 2004 on unconscious affect and unconscious emotions in general as well as Berger, Nanay, & Quilty‐Dunn, 2018 for a philosophical summary).”
From Conative Dissonance (2026) · cites this paper as Berger, Nanay, & Quilty‐Dunn, 2018
Citations
Cites
An information integration theory of consciousness
Tononi, G. (2004) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-5-42 · Cited by 1,958
Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind
Tye, M. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6712.001.0001 · Cited by 1,718
Why visual attention and awareness are different
Lamme, V. A. F. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00013-x · Cited by 1,172
Rosenthal, D. M. (1986) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/bf00355521 · Cited by 1,019
Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness
Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009 · Cited by 869
Carruthers, P. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199277362.001.0001 · Cited by 127
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 10.5840/philtopics198614118 · DOI
- Armstrong D. M., 1968, A Materialist Theory of the Mind
- Baars B. J., 1988, A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness
- Baddeley A. D., 1986, Working Memory
- 10.1080/05568649209506374 · DOI
- 10.1111/phc3.v9.6 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-007-6001-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/analys/anw060 · DOI
- Block N., 2007, Consciousness, Function, and Representation: Collected Papers, Volume 1, 10.7551/mitpress/2111.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/phpr.12258 · DOI
- Bonjour L., 1985, The Structure of Empirical Knowledge
- Brandom R., 1994, Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, & Discursive Commitment
- 10.1111/phpr.2003.67.issue-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11098-015-0537-7 · DOI
- Chalmers D. J., 1996, The Conscious Mind. in Search of a Fundamental Theory
- Chalmers D. J., 2003, Consciousness: New Philosophical Perspectives, 220, 10.1093/oso/9780199241286.003.0009 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11098-010-9495-2 · DOI
- 10.1515/9783110325843.51 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Dennett D. C., 1991, Consciousness Explained
- 10.1007/s11098-008-9225-1 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00372404 · DOI
- Feldman R., 2001, American Philosophical Quarterly, 38, 1
- 10.1007/978-94-009-9493-5_1 · DOI
- 10.5840/jphil2009106611 · DOI
- 10.1080/17588928.2011.565121 · DOI · Paper page
- Hameroff S. R., 1994, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1, 91
- 10.1111/j.1533-6077.2011.00200.x · DOI
- 10.2307/2960077 · DOI · Paper page
- Jeannerod M., 1997, The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action
- Kentridge R. W., 2011, Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, 228
- 10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rstb.2007.2093 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570355.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Lehrer K., 1990, Theory of Knowledge
- 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.006 · DOI
- Lycan W. G., 1996, Consciousness and Experience
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195373578.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/phis.12073 · DOI
- Mack A., 1998, Inattentional Blindness, 10.7551/mitpress/3707.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1080/0020174X.2014.858417 · DOI
- 10.1038/336766a0 · DOI · Paper page
- Milner A. D., 1995, The Visual Brain in Action
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190633776.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11098-014-0293-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/analys/anp165 · DOI
- 10.1111/phpr.2016.93.issue-2 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.91.16.7398 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/ccog.2000.0442 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195314595.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/0029-4624.00277 · DOI
- Quilty-Dunn J., Unconscious Perception and Phenomenal Coherence
- Rosenthal D. M., 2005, Consciousness and Mind, 10.1093/oso/9780198236979.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Shea N., 2016, Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1, 1
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198797081.001.0001 · DOI
- Siegel S., 2015, The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception, 781
- Siegel S., Attention and Perceptual Justification
- 10.1093/mind/fzr030 · DOI
- Silins N., 2014, Scepticism and Perceptual Justification, 149
- 10.5840/jphil201110811 · DOI
- 10.1111/mila.2011.26.issue-2 · DOI
- 10.1521/soco.2011.29.6.738 · DOI
- Talbott W. J., 1990, The Reliability of the Cognitive Mechanism
- 10.1007/s11229-016-1233-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrn.2016.44 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/phpe.2011.24.issue-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899494.001.0001 · DOI
- Weiskrantz L., 2009, Blindsight: A Case Study Spanning 35 Years and New Developments, 10.1093/oso/9780199567218.001.0001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nanay, B. (2026) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Berger, J., Nanay, B., & Quilty-Dunn, J.
- Affiliations
- Idaho State University (US)
- Centre for Philosophical Psychology, University of Antwerp , Antwerp, Belgium
- Philosophy, University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
- Corresponding author
- Berger, Jacob
- ORCID
- Berger, Jacob
- Venue
- Inquiry
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-02-22
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 569-589
- ISSN
- 0020-174X (ISSN-L)
- 1502-3923
- OpenAlex
- W2791923583
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Inquiry (publishedVersion)
- PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G0C7416N, Odysseus G.0020.12N)
- H2020 European Research Council (726251)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- unconscious perception, perceptual justification, epistemic justification, externalism, functionalism, theory of consciousness, masked priming, epistemology of perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unconscious perceptual justification*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/0020174x.2018.1432413
- The paper
- Berger, J., Nanay, B., & Quilty-Dunn, J. (2018). Unconscious perceptual justification*. Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174x.2018.1432413