The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE DIMENSIONS OF AIRBORNE ASBESTOS FIBRES— I. CROCIDOLITE FROM KURUMAN AREA, CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA
Abstract
The dimensions of airborne fibres collected at an underground mine and two mills producing crocidolite in the Kuruman area of Cape Province, South Africa, and of those collected at a plant manufacturing pipes in South Africa using Cape crocidolite and chrysotile asbestos are reported. The measurements were made using a transmission electron microscope, a scanning electron microscope and a light optical microscope. There was no apparent change in diameter with stage of processing although in certain processes, such as cutting asbestos cement pipe, the presence of chrysotile fibres altered the size distribution markedly. However, there was some change in length with stage of processing. The finding that the observed diameter distributions in airborne samples in this study are similar to those previously reported in the lungs of workers exposed to Cape crocidolite may indicate that, if diameter is the important parameter in relation to health effects, the hazard associated with exposure to Cape crocidolite should, dose for dose, be similar for all stages of processing. The proportion of long fibres in the air has been found to be very small and observations on very large numbers of fibres are necessary to confirm their presence.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In these studies the non-regulated fibers, SAF, and LAF with a diameter < 0.2 μm, represented between 50 and 100% of the total fibers, with the majority of samples between 80 and 100% respectively.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Analysis of asbestos size categories according to sectors of activity and the concentration levels found in the literature [10-18] highlight a number of sectors with higher prevalence of SAF, including in particular asbestos cement production, friction materials production, brake systems repair and mining.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
Interpretation of Airborne Asbestos Measurements
Chesson, J., Rench, J. D., Schultz, B. D., & Milne, K. L. (1990) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1990.tb00527.x · Cited by 8
Bardelli, F., Brun, F., De Panfilis, S., Cloetens, P., Capella, S., Belluso, E., Bellis, D., Di Napoli, A., & Cedola, A. (2021) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2021.05.002 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Venue
- The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1981-01-01
- ISSN
- 1475-3162
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE DIMENSIONS OF AIRBORNE ASBESTOS FIBRES— I. CROCIDOLITE FROM KURUMAN AREA, CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annhyg/24.1.23
- The paper
- THE DIMENSIONS OF AIRBORNE ASBESTOS FIBRES— I. CROCIDOLITE FROM KURUMAN AREA, CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA. (1981). The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/24.1.23