The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exposure-Related Health Effects of Silver and Silver Compounds: A Review
Abstract
A critical review of studies examining exposures to the various forms of silver was conducted to determine if some silver species are more toxic than others. The impetus behind conducting this review is that several occupational exposure limits and guidelines exist for silver, but the values for each depend on the form of silver as well as the individual agency making the recommendations. For instance, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists has established separate threshold limit values for metallic silver (0.1 mg/m3) and soluble compounds of silver (0.01 mg/m3). On the other hand, the permissible exposure limit (PEL) recommended by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Mine Safety and Health Administration and the recommended exposure limit set by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health is 0.01 mg/m3 for all forms of silver. The adverse effects of chronic exposure to silver are a permanent bluish-gray discoloration of the skin (argyria) or eyes (argyrosis). Most studies discuss cases of argyria and argyrosis that have resulted primarily from exposure to the soluble forms of silver. Besides argyria and argyrosis, exposure to soluble silver compounds may produce other toxic effects, including liver and kidney damage, irritation of the eyes, skin, respiratory, and intestinal tract, and changes in blood cells. Metallic silver appears to pose minimal risk to health. The current occupational exposure limits do not reflect the apparent difference in toxicities between soluble and metallic silver; thus, many researchers have recommended that separate PELs be established.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metal-Based Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents: An Overview
Sánchez-López, E., Gomes, D., Esteruelas, G., Bonilla, L., Lopez-Machado, A. L., Galindo, R., Cano, A., Espina, M., Ettcheto, M., Camins, A., et al. (2020) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano10020292 · Cited by 1,474
Alternative Antimicrobial Approach: Nano-Antimicrobial Materials
Beyth, N., Houri-Haddad, Y., Domb, A., Khan, W., & Hazan, R. (2015) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2015/246012 · Cited by 837
Nanoparticle toxicity by the gastrointestinal route: evidence and knowledge gaps
Bergin, I. L., & Witzmann, F. A. (2013) · International Journal of Biomedical Nanoscience and Nanotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbnn.2013.054515 · Cited by 412
Disinfection by-products in drinking water: Occurrence, toxicity and abatement
Srivastav, A. L., Patel, N., & Chaudhary, V. K. (2020) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115474 · Cited by 342
George, S., Xia, T., Rallo, R., Zhao, Y., Ji, Z., Lin, S., Wang, X., Zhang, H., France, B., Schoenfeld, D., et al. (2011) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn102734s · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Venue
- The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-06-17
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 575-85
- ISSN
- 0003-4878 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3162
- OpenAlex
- W2129197362
- Cited by
- 727
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exposure-Related Health Effects of Silver and Silver Compounds: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annhyg/mei019
- The paper
- Exposure-Related Health Effects of Silver and Silver Compounds: A Review. (2005). The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mei019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.