Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 20

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Airborne Asbestos Concentrations Associated with Heavy Equipment Brake Removal

·2009·The Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Abstract

Asbestos-containing brake linings were used in heavy-duty construction equipment such as tractors, backhoes, and bulldozers prior to the 1980s. While several published studies have evaluated exposures to mechanics during brake repair work, most have focused on automobiles and light trucks, not on heavy agricultural or construction vehicles. The purpose of this study is to characterize the airborne concentration of asbestos to workers and bystanders from brake wear debris during brake removal from 12 loader/backhoes and tractors manufactured between 1960 and 1980. Asbestos content in brake lining (average 20% chrysotile by polarized light microscopy) and brake wear debris [average 0.49% chrysotile by transmission electron microscopy (TEM)] was also quantified. Breathing zone samples on the lapel of mechanics (n = 44) and area samples at bystander (n = 34), remote (n = 22), and ambient (n = 12) locations were collected during 12 brake changes and analyzed using phase contrast microscopy (PCM) [National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 7400] and TEM (NIOSH 7402). In addition, the fiber distribution by size and morphology was evaluated according to the International Organization for Standardization method for asbestos. Applying the ratio of asbestos fibers:total fibers (including non-asbestos) as determined by TEM to the PCM results, the average airborne chrysotile concentrations (PCM equivalent) were 0.024 f/cc for the mechanic and 0.009 f/cc for persons stan…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annhyg/mep056

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 68 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 2000, American journal of industrial medicine, 37, 157
  2. Eisenbud, 1949, 31, 282
  3. 1975, Inhaled particles, 4, 75
  4. Miller, 1999, Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 43, 167, 10.1093/annhyg/43.3.167 · doi:10.1093/annhyg/43.3.167
  5. 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal, 49, A12
  6. Morgan, 1980, British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 37, 25
  7. 1994, Federal register, 59, 40964
  8. 2008, 19, 458
  9. 1985, American Journal of Epidemiology, 122, 518
  10. Stanton, 1981, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 67, 965
  11. 1994, Aerosol Science and Technology, 24, 193
  12. TIMBRELL, 1982, Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 26, 347, 10.1093/annhyg/26.2.347 · doi:10.1093/annhyg/26.2.347
  13. 1995, Environmental Research (New York), 65, 243

Cited by

See all 20

Metadata

Venue
The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Published
2009-08-19
ISSN
1475-3162
Cited by
20
References
68
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Airborne Asbestos Concentrations Associated with Heavy Equipment Brake Removal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annhyg/mep056
The paper
Airborne Asbestos Concentrations Associated with Heavy Equipment Brake Removal. (2009). The Annals of Occupational Hygiene. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mep056

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.