Total Inward Leakage Measurement of Particulates for N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators—A Comparison Study
Abstract
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) certified particulate respirators need to be properly fit tested before use to ensure workers' respiratory protection. However, the effectiveness of American National Standards Institute-/Occupational Safety and Health Administration (ANSI-/OSHA)-accepted fit tests for particulate respirators in predicting actual workplace protection provided to workers is lacking. NIOSH addressed this issue by evaluating the fit of half-mask particulate filtering respirators as a component of a program designed to add total inward leakage (TIL) requirements for all respirators to Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations Part 84. Specifically, NIOSH undertook a validation study to evaluate the reproducibility of the TIL test procedure between two laboratories. A PortaCount® was used to measure the TIL of five N95 model filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) on test subjects in two different laboratories. Concurrently, filter efficiency for four of the five N95 FFR models was measured using laboratory aerosol as well as polydisperse NaCl aerosol employed for NIOSH particulate respirator certification. Results showed that two N95 models passed the TIL tests at a rate of ~80-85% and ~86-94% in the two laboratories, respectively. However, the TIL passing rate for the other three N95 models was 0-5.7% in both laboratories combined. Good agreement (≥83%) of the TIL data between the two laboratories was obtained. The three models that had relatively lower filter efficiency for laboratory aerosol as well as for NaCl aerosol showed relatively low TIL passing rates in both laboratories. Of the four models tested for penetration, one model with relatively higher efficiency showed a higher passing rate for TIL tests in both laboratories indicating that filter efficiency might influence TIL. Further studies are needed to better understand the implications of the data in the workplace.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because of higher filter efficiency, N95 FFRs are expected to show lower TIL values than SMs.
“Because of the higher filter efficiency, N95 FFRs are expected to show lower TIL values than do SMs as described previously. (24,26)”
Faceseal leakage is a major pathway that contributes to the TIL of particles.
“Faceseal leakage is known to be a major pathway that contributes to the TIL of particles. (25-27)”
Cites
Lee, S.-A., Grinshpun, S. A., & Reponen, T. (2008) · The Annals of Occupational Hygiene · doi:10.1093/annhyg/men005 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Fitting Characteristics of Eighteen N95 Filtering-Facepiece Respirators
Coffey, C. C., Lawrence, R. B., Campbell, D. L., Zhuang, Z., Calvert, C. A., & Jensen, P. A. (2004) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459620490433799 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
(2012) · The Annals of Occupational Hygiene · doi:10.1093/annhyg/mer122 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rengasamy, S., Eimer, B. C., & Szalajda, J. (2014) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459624.2013.866715 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“(24,26) Faceseal leakage is a major pathway for aerosol transport inside the filtering device.”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Rengasamy, S., Walbert, G. F., Newcomb, W. E., Faulkner, K. A., Rengasamy, M. M., Brannen, J. J., & Szalajda, J. V.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
- ORCID
- Gary F. Walbert
- Venue
- The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-10-09
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 206-16
- ISSN
- 0003-4878 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3162
- OpenAlex
- W2140042337
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Annals of Occupational Hygiene (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
- Keywords
- N95 respirators, particulate respirators, respirator fit testing, filtration efficiency, NaCl aerosol
- MeSH terms
- Aerosols, Air Pollutants, Occupational, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure, Filtration, Humans, Masks, Materials Testing, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S., Particle Size, Respiratory Protective Devices, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Occupational Health, Occupational Exposure, Inhalation Exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review