Cited by 22Infection Control and VentilationOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation

Total Inward Leakage Measurement of Particulates for N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators—A Comparison Study

Samy Rengasamy, Gary F. Walbert, William E. Newcomb, Kimberly A. Faulkner, Mathi M Rengasamy, Jeremy J Brannen, Jonathan V. Szalajda·2013·The Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Abstract

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) certified particulate respirators need to be properly fit tested before use to ensure workers' respiratory protection. However, the effectiveness of American National Standards Institute-/Occupational Safety and Health Administration (ANSI-/OSHA)-accepted fit tests for particulate respirators in predicting actual workplace protection provided to workers is lacking. NIOSH addressed this issue by evaluating the fit of half-mask particulate filtering respirators as a component of a program designed to add total inward leakage (TIL) requirements for all respirators to Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations Part 84. Specifically, NIOSH undertook a validation study to evaluate the reproducibility of the TIL test procedure between two laboratories. A PortaCount® was used to measure the TIL of five N95 model filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) on test subjects in two different laboratories. Concurrently, filter efficiency for four of the five N95 FFR models was measured using laboratory aerosol as well as polydisperse NaCl aerosol employed for NIOSH particulate respirator certification. Results showed that two N95 models passed the TIL tests at a rate of ~80-85% and ~86-94% in the two laboratories, respectively. However, the TIL passing rate for the other three N95 models was 0-5.7% in both laboratories combined. Good agreement (≥83%) of the TIL data between the two laboratories was obtained. The three models that had relatively lower filter efficiency for laboratory aerosol as well as for NaCl aerosol showed relatively low TIL passing rates in both laboratories. Of the four models tested for penetration, one model with relatively higher efficiency showed a higher passing rate for TIL tests in both laboratories indicating that filter efficiency might influence TIL. Further studies are needed to better understand the implications of the data in the workplace.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annhyg/met054

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rengasamy, S., Walbert, G. F., Newcomb, W. E., Faulkner, K. A., Rengasamy, M. M., Brannen, J. J., & Szalajda, J. V.
Affiliations
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
Venue
The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Published
2013-10-09
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
206-16
ISSN
  • 0003-4878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3162
OpenAlex
W2140042337
Cited by
22
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of Occupational Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Keywords
N95 respirators, particulate respirators, respirator fit testing, filtration efficiency, NaCl aerosol
MeSH terms
Aerosols, Air Pollutants, Occupational, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure, Filtration, Humans, Masks, Materials Testing, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S., Particle Size, Respiratory Protective Devices, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Occupational Health, Occupational Exposure, Inhalation Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review