Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in previously treated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the PALOMA-3 trial

Open access
Harbeck, N., Iyer, S., Turner, N., Cristofanilli, M., Ro, J., André, F., Loi, S., Verma, S., Iwata, H., Bhattacharyya, H., Puyana Theall, K., Bartlett, C.H., Loibl, S.·2016·Annals of Oncology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the PALOMA-3 study, palbociclib plus fulvestrant demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant plus placebo in hormone receptor-positive, HER2- endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This analysis compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between the two treatment groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive palbociclib 125 mg/day orally for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off (n = 347) plus fulvestrant (500 mg i.m. per standard of care) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n = 174). PROs were assessed on day 1 of cycles 1-4 and of every other subsequent cycle starting with cycle 6 using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its breast cancer module, QLQ-BR23. High scores (range 0-100) could indicate better functioning/quality of life (QoL) or worse symptom severity. Repeated-measures mixed-effect analyses were carried out to compare on-treatment overall scores and changes from baseline between treatment groups while controlling for baseline. Between-group comparisons of time to deterioration in global QoL and pain were made using an unstratified log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Questionnaire completion rates were high at baseline and during treatment (from baseline to cycle 14, ≥95.8% in each group completed ≥1 question on the EORTC QLQ-C30). On treatment, estimated overall global QoL scores significantly favored the palbociclib plus fulvestrant group [66.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 64.5-67.7 versus 63.0, 95% CI 60.6-65.3; P = 0.0313]. Significantly greater improvement from baseline in pain was also observed in this group (-3.3, 95% CI -5.1 to -1.5 versus 2.0, 95% CI -0.6 to 4.6; P = 0.0011). No significant differences were observed for other QLQ-BR23 functioning domains, breast or arm symptoms. Treatment with palbociclib plus fulvestrant significantly delayed deterioration in global QoL (P < 0.025) and pain (P < 0.001) compared with fulvestrant alone. CONCLUSION: Palbociclib plus fulvestrant allowed patients to maintain good QoL in the endocrine resistance setting while experiencing substantially delayed disease progression. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01942135.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdw139

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Butters, 2010, Addition of drug/s to a chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, CD003368
  2. Miles, 2002, Combination versus sequential single-agent therapy in metastatic breast cancer, Oncologist, 7, 13, 10.1634/theoncologist.2002-0013 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Gupta, 2014, The association of chemotherapy versus hormonal therapy and health outcomes among patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: experience from the patient perspective, Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 14, 929, 10.1586/14737167.2014.949243 · DOI
  4. PM Fayers, NK Aaronson, K Bjordal et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, 3rd edition. Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 2001.
  5. Osoba, 1998, Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores, J Clin Oncol, 16, 139, 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Warren, 2010, Uncertainty, lack of control and emotional functioning in women with metastatic breast cancer: a review and secondary analysis of the literature using the critical appraisal technique, Eur J Cancer Care (Engl), 19, 564, 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01215.x · DOI

Cited by

See all 176

Metadata

Authors
Harbeck, N., Iyer, S., Turner, N., Cristofanilli, M., Ro, J., André, F., Loi, S., Verma, S., Iwata, H., Bhattacharyya, H., Puyana Theall, K., Bartlett, C. H., & Loibl, S.
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1047-1054
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313479654
Cited by
176
References
7
FWCI
19.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
Funders
Pfizer Inc.

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in previously treated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the PALOMA-3 trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/annonc/mdw139
The paper
Harbeck, N., Iyer, S., Turner, N., Cristofanilli, M., Ro, J., André, F., Loi, S., Verma, S., Iwata, H., Bhattacharyya, H., Puyana Theall, K., Bartlett, C. H., & Loibl, S. (2016). Quality of life with palbociclib plus fulvestrant in previously treated hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes from the PALOMA-3 trial. Annals of Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw139

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.