Cited by 17Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysCell death mechanisms and regulationProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Phase I/II study of combined BCL-XL and MEK inhibition with navitoclax (N) and trametinib (T) in KRAS or NRAS mutant advanced solid tumours

Open access
Corcoran, R.B., Do, K.T., Cleary, J.M., Parikh, A.R., Yeku, O.O., Weekes, C.D., Veneris, J., Ahronian, L.G. +11 more·2019·Annals of Oncology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdz244.009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combination treatments with navitoclax have been widely trialed in other in vivo strains and patients without major reported toxicities.

    “combination treatments with navitoclax have been widely trialed in other in vivo strains and patients without major reported toxicities”

    From Bcl-xL Is a Key Mediator of Apoptosis Following KRASG12C Inhibition in <i>KRASG12C</i> -mutant Colorectal Cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [49]

    The Results report grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events in 40% of the 43 patients, contrary to the claim that no major toxicities were reported. The paper describes a navitoclax–trametinib trial in patients and mentions tumour regressions in mouse models, but does not establish that navitoclax combinations were widely trialed across other strains and patients. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corcoran, R. B., Do, K. T., Cleary, J. M., Parikh, A. R., Yeku, O. O., Weekes, C. D., Veneris, J., Ahronian, L. G., Mauri, G., Van Seventer, E. E., Fetter, I. J., Gurski, J. M., Matulonis, U. A., Juric, D., Flaherty, K. T., Sullivan, R. J., Clark, J. W., Heist, R. S., & Shapiro, G. I.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
30
Pages
v164
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2978342037
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
navitoclax, trametinib, BCL-XL inhibition, MEK inhibition, KRAS mutation, NRAS mutation, RAS-mutant cancers, advanced solid tumors, combination therapy, dose escalation, building information modeling, synthetic lethality, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, gynecologic cancer, treatment-related adverse events, disease control rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review