Cited by 116Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies

Performance of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC): Post-hoc analysis of IMpassion130

Open access
Rugo, H.S., Loi, S., Adams, S., Schmid, P., Schneeweiss, A., Barrios, C.H., Iwata, H., Dieras, V.C. +9 more·2019·Annals of Oncology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annonc/mdz394.009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SP263 and 22-C3 assays failed to reproduce SP142 clinical validity in the context of the IMpassion-130 trial.

    “SP263 (Ventana) and 22-C3 (Dako), both of which are widely used in pathology laboratories for other tumour types, have been evaluated for their clinical validity in the context of the IMpassion-130 trial but failed to reproduce SP142 clinical validity.90”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rugo, H. S., Loi, S., Adams, S., Schmid, P., Schneeweiss, A., Barrios, C. H., Iwata, H., Dieras, V. C., Winer, E. P., Kockx, M., Peeters, D., Chui, S. Y., Lin, J. C., Nguyen Duc, A., Viale, G., Molinero, L., & Emens, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Aichi Cancer Center (JP)
  • Centre Eugène Marquis (FR)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • HistoGeneX (Belgium) (BE)
  • Genentech (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
30
Pages
v858-v859
ISSN
0923-7534 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997305322
Cited by
116
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 3
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annals of Oncology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  • Celgene
  • Celldex Therapeutics
  • Les Laboratories Pierre Fabre
  • BeiGene
  • Incyte
  • Puma Biotechnology
  • Eisai
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Servier
  • PharmaMar
  • Genentech
  • Daiichi Sankyo Europe
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Keywords
PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, triple-negative breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer, atezolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, SP142, SP263, 22C3, assay concordance, predictive biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review