Cited by 51Thermoregulation and physiological responsesOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

Heat strain and hydration of Japanese construction workers during work in summer

Ueno, Satoru, Sakakibara, Yoko, Hisanaga, Naomi, Oka, Tatsuo, Yamaguchi-Sekino, Sachiko·2018·Annals of Work Exposures and Health

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to ascertain hydration and heat strain of construction workers in Japan during the summer who are at the highest risk of heat-related disorders. Methods: The subjects were 23 construction workers, whose average age was 41, average weight was 69 kg, and average height was 170 cm. We measured thermal working conditions with a wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) measurement instrument affixed to the helmet of each worker, at fixed points outdoors in the sun and indoors. Heat strain was evaluated for water intake, urine specific gravity (Usg), urine temperature (UT), heart rate (HR), and body weight during work. Results: The average WBGT measured on the worker helmets over 3 consecutive days was 28.0 ± 0.7, 27.6 ± 0.8, and 27.6 ± 1.1°C. The average water intake was 2.6 l during a work shift. The average Usg, UT, and % HR reserve were the highest in the first half of afternoon work. Seventy-eight percent of the subjects exceeded at least one of the ACGIH TLV physiological guidelines for heat strain in terms of HR and weight loss or a clinically dehydrated level of Usg. Conclusions: Heat strain was the highest in the first half of afternoon work. The number of dehydrated workers increased during this shift because of insufficient water intake. Adequate hydration is required to decrease the risk of heat-related disorders among construction workers in the summer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annweh/wxy012

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ueno, S., Sakakibara, Y., Hisanaga, N., Oka, T., & Yamaguchi-Sekino, S.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (JP)
  • Aichi University of Education (JP)
  • Aichi Gakusen University (JP)
  • National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety, Nagao, Tama-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
Corresponding author
Ueno, Satoru
Venue
Annals of Work Exposures and Health
Published
2018-03-24
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
571-582
ISSN
  • 2398-7308 (ISSN-L)
  • 2398-7316
OpenAlex
W2790732583
Cited by
51
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Work Exposures and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Keywords
heat strain, hydration, construction workers, summer jobs, water intake, urine specific gravity, heart rate, weight loss, wet bulb globe temperature, shift work, occupational heat exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Temperature, Dehydration, Heart Rate, Hot Temperature, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Specific Gravity, Water Loss, Insensible, Occupational Exposure, Urinalysis, Heat Stress Disorders, Construction Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review