The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanisms of Recent Genome Size Variation in Flowering Plants
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Plant nuclear genomes vary tremendously in DNA content, mostly due to differences in ancestral ploidy and variation in the degree of transposon amplification. These processes can increase genome size, but little is known about mechanisms of genome shrinkage and the degree to which these can attenuate or reverse genome expansion. This research focuses on characterizing DNA removal from the rice and Arabidopsis genomes, and discusses whether loss of DNA has effectively competed with amplification in these species. METHODS: Retrotransposons were analyzed for sequence variation within several element families in rice and Arabidopsis. Nucleotide sequence changes in the two termini of individual retrotransposons were used to date their time of insertion. KEY RESULTS: An accumulation of small deletions was found in both species, caused by unequal homologous recombination and illegitimate recombination. The relative contribution of unequal homologous recombination compared to illegitimate recombination was higher in rice than in Arabidopsis. However, retrotransposons are rapidly removed in both species, as evidenced by the similar apparent ages of intact elements (most less than 3 million years old) in these two plants and all other investigated plant species. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in the activity of mechanisms for retrotransposon regulation or deletion generation between species could explain current genome size variation without any requirement for natural selection to act on this trait, although the results do not preclude selection as a contributing factor. The simplest model suggests that significant genome size variation is generated by lineage-specific differences in the molecular mechanisms of DNA amplification and removal, creating major variation in nuclear DNA content that can then serve as the substrate for fitness-based selection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana
Initiative, T. A. G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35048692 · Cited by 9,301
Cited by
DNA transposons and the evolution of eukaryotic genomes.
Feschotte, C., & Pritham, E. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090448 · Cited by 1,218
Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants
Soltis, P. S., Marchant, D. B., Van de Peer, Y., & Soltis, D. E. (2015) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.11.003 · Cited by 773
Dynamics of genome size evolution in birds and mammals
Kapusta, A., Suh, A., & Feschotte, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1616702114 · Cited by 466
Xia, E., Tong, W., Hou, Y., An, Y., Chen, L., Wu, Q., Liu, Y., Yu, J., Li, F., Li, R., et al. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.04.010 · Cited by 452
Synergy between sequence and size in Large-scale genomics
Gregory, T. R. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1674 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- BENNETZEN, J. L.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-132
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2163471569
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanisms of Recent Genome Size Variation in Flowering Plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mci008
- The paper
- BENNETZEN, J. L. (2005). Mechanisms of Recent Genome Size Variation in Flowering Plants. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.