Cited by 1,083Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsPlant Stress Responses and TolerancePlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 218 of the 218 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salt stress has become a major threat to plant growth and productivity. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonize plant root systems and modulate plant growth in various ways. SCOPE: This review addresses the significance of arbuscular mycorrhiza in alleviation of salt stress and their beneficial effects on plant growth and productivity. It also focuses on recent progress in unravelling biochemical, physiological and molecular mechanisms in mycorrhizal plants to alleviate salt stress. CONCLUSIONS: The role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviating salt stress is well documented. This paper reviews the mechanisms arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi employ to enhance the salt tolerance of host plants such as enhanced nutrient acquisition (P, N, Mg and Ca), maintenance of the K(+) : Na(+) ratio, biochemical changes (accumulation of proline, betaines, polyamines, carbohydrates and antioxidants), physiological changes (photosynthetic efficiency, relative permeability, water status, abscissic acid accumulation, nodulation and nitrogen fixation), molecular changes (the expression of genes: PIP, Na(+)/H(+) antiporters, Lsnced, Lslea and LsP5CS) and ultra-structural changes. Theis review identifies certain lesser explored areas such as molecular and ultra-structural changes where further research is needed for better understanding of symbiosis with reference to salt stress for optimum usage of this technology in the field on a large scale. This review paper gives useful benchmark information for the development and prioritization of future research programmes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aob/mcp251

Cites

218 of 218 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–218 of 218

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bhaskaran, 1997, Seasonal incidence and distribution of VAM fungi in native saline soils, Journal of Environmental Biology, 18, 209
  2. Brundrett, 1991, Mycorrhizas in natural ecosystem, Advances in Ecological Research, 21, 300
  3. El-Desouky, 1998, Growth perfomance of citrus rootstocks under saline conditions, Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Research, 43, 231
  4. Harisnaut, 2003, Salinity effects on antioxidant enzymes in mulberry cultivar, Science Asia, 29, 109, 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2003.29.109 · DOI
  5. Lindermann, 1994, Role of VAM in biocontrol, 1
  6. Smith, 1995, Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 105
  7. Thanna, 1994, Salinity and mycorrhizal association in relation to carbohydrate status, leaf chlorophyll and activity of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase enzymes in sour orange seedlings, Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Research, 39, 263
  8. Tinker, 1975, Soil chemistry of phosphorus and mycorrhizal effects on plant growth, 353
  9. Xu, 2000, Advances in chloride nutrition, Advances in Agronomy, 68, 96

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,083

Metadata

Authors
Evelin, H., Kapoor, R., & Giri, B.
Affiliations
University of Delhi (IN)
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
2009-10-08
Volume
104
Issue
7
Pages
1263-1280
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W2131136324
Cited by
1,083
References
218
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 40
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Botany (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Keywords
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, salt stress, salt tolerance, plant-microbe symbiosis, nutrient acquisition, Na+/K+ ratio, proline accumulation, betaine, polyamines, antioxidants, photosynthetic efficiency, water status, abscisic acid, nodulation, nitrogen fixation, PIP aquaporins, Na+/H+ antiporter, gene expression
MeSH terms
Sodium Chloride, Soil Microbiology, Stress, Physiological, Sodium-Hydrogen Exchangers, Magnoliopsida, Mycorrhizae, Salinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review