The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning from halophytes: physiological basis and strategies to improve abiotic stress tolerance in crops
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Global annual losses in agricultural production from salt-affected land are in excess of US$12 billion and rising. At the same time, a significant amount of arable land is becoming lost to urban sprawl, forcing agricultural production into marginal areas. Consequently, there is a need for a major breakthrough in crop breeding for salinity tolerance. Given the limited range of genetic diversity in this trait within traditional crops, stress tolerance genes and mechanisms must be identified in extremophiles and then introduced into traditional crops. SCOPE AND CONCLUSIONS: This review argues that learning from halophytes may be a promising way of achieving this goal. The paper is focused around two central questions: what are the key physiological mechanisms conferring salinity tolerance in halophytes that can be introduced into non-halophyte crop species to improve their performance under saline conditions and what specific genes need to be targeted to achieve this goal? The specific traits that are discussed and advocated include: manipulation of trichome shape, size and density to enable their use for external Na(+) sequestration; increasing the efficiency of internal Na(+) sequestration in vacuoles by the orchestrated regulation of tonoplast NHX exchangers and slow and fast vacuolar channels, combined with greater cytosolic K(+) retention; controlling stomata aperture and optimizing water use efficiency by reducing stomatal density; and efficient control of xylem ion loading, enabling rapid shoot osmotic adjustment while preventing prolonged Na(+) transport to the shoot.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
Salinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
The Mechanism of Salt Tolerance in Halophytes
Flowers, T. J., Troke, P. F., & Yeo, A. R. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.000513 · Cited by 1,942
Cited by
Phytohormones and plant responses to salinity stress: a review
Fahad, S., Hussain, S., Matloob, A., Khan, F. A., Khaliq, A., Saud, S., Hassan, S., Shan, D., Khan, F., Ullah, N., et al. (2015) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s10725-014-0013-y · Cited by 835
Song, J., & Wang, B. (2015) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcu194 · Cited by 409
Plant Salt Stress: Adaptive Responses, Tolerance Mechanism and Bioengineering for Salt Tolerance
Muchate, N. S., Nikalje, G. C., Rajurkar, N. S., Suprasanna, P., & Nikam, T. D. (2016) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/s12229-016-9173-y · Cited by 359
Yuan, F., Leng, B., & Wang, B. (2016) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00977 · Cited by 320
Quinoa: In Perspective of Global Challenges
Jaikishun, S., Li, W., Yang, Z., & Song, S. (2019) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy9040176 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Shabala, S.
- Venue
- Annals of Botany
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-10-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1209-1221
- ISSN
- 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8290
- OpenAlex
- W2102174517
- Cited by
- 857
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 45.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning from halophytes: physiological basis and strategies to improve abiotic stress tolerance in crops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/aob/mct205
- The paper
- Shabala, S. (2013). Learning from halophytes: physiological basis and strategies to improve abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Annals of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.