Cited by 4Light effects on plantsPlant and Biological Electrophysiology StudiesMagnetic and Electromagnetic Effects

Leaf movements and their relationship with the lunisolar gravitational force

Open access
Barlow, Peter W.·2016·Annals of Botany

Abstract

Annals of Botany116: 149–187, 2015 Since the publication of this paper, it has become apparent that there was an error on line 6 of the Discussion (page 177), where 1 g is wrongly defined in terms of microGals. The statement: 1 g = 9·81 × 10–8 μGals should be 1 g = 9·81 × 108 μGals. The author would like to apologize for this error.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aob/mcv164

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barlow, P. W.
Corresponding author
Barlow, Peter W.
Venue
Annals of Botany
Published
2015-10-09
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
215-215
ISSN
  • 0305-7364 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8290
OpenAlex
W4239790156
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annals of Botany (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects
Keywords
leaf movement, lunar gravity, solar gravity, plant gravitropism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review