The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers
Abstract
This paper discusses the results of a project to identify the kinds of verbs used in citations in academic papers, as a basis for developing teaching materials for non-native-speaker students who need to read or write academic papers. Categories are suggested for classifying the verbs both in terms of their denotation and of their evaluative potential, in order to illuminate the role that they play in the evaluation that their presence entails. The ways in which denotation and evaluative potential interact and some of the effects of the immediate context (for example, negation) are examined. Particular attention is paid to the ways in which the writer commits herself to or detaches herself from the reported proposition to varying degrees. Finally, an idealized model of the ‘layers of report’ that may be involved in citations is presented as a means of drawing together the various choices available. The model mayserve as a pedagogic image to help the students in understanding or choosing reporting verbs and, beyond that, in interpreting or conveying evaluation in academic papers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/s0889-4906(02)00026-1 · Cited by 567
Hooking the reader: a corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002 · Cited by 404
Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students' writing
Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90033-3 · Cited by 267
Charles, M. (2003) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/s1475-1585(03)00048-1 · Cited by 228
An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles
Teufel, S., Carletta, J., & Moens, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the ninth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - · doi:10.3115/977035.977051 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- THOMPSON, G., & YIYUN, Y.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1991-12-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 365-382
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W1980118257
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/applin/12.4.365
- The paper
- THOMPSON, G., & YIYUN, Y. (1991). Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/12.4.365
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.