The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts
Abstract
Autonomy in language learning is sometimes presented as a Western concept unsuited to contexts, such as those in East Asia, which have different educational traditions. This paper argues that this view is unfounded but that we need to match the different aspects of autonomy with the characteristics and needs of learners in specific contexts. First the paper analyses the concept of autonomy as it relates to language learning and proposes a framework which would be applicable to learners in all contexts. Then it looks at three sources of influence which many teachers and researchers believe to have an important effect on students' approaches to learning in East Asia: the collectivist orientation of East Asian societies; their acceptance of relationships based on power and authority; and the belief that success may be achieved through effort as much as through innate ability. The paper then considers some of the attitudes and habits of learning which we might expect to result from these sociocultural influences. These are presented as hypotheses which might guide us towards a better understanding of our students but should not blind us tot the immense variation that exists in reality. Within the framework for analysing autonomy developed earlier, the paper considers what aspects of autonomy might be most strongly rooted in East Asian traditions and how they might be developed in support of language learning. The paper warns against setting up stereotypic notions of 'East Asian learners' which, if misused, may make teachers less rather than more sensitive to the dispositions and needs of individual students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00111 · Cited by 1,233
The Use of Motivational Strategies in Language Instruction: The Case of EFL Teaching in Taiwan
Cheng, H.-F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.2167/illt048.0 · Cited by 417
Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Integrative Orientations of French Canadian Learners of English
Noels, K., Clément, R., & Pelletier, L. (2001) · The Canadian Modern Language Review · doi:10.3138/cmlr.57.3.424 · Cited by 317
Situated willingness to communicate in an L2: Interplay of individual characteristics and context
Yashima, T., MacIntyre, P. D., & Ikeda, M. (2018) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168816657851 · Cited by 217
Exploring “Flow” in young Chinese EFL learners' online English learning activities
Liu, H., & Song, X. (2021) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102425 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- Littlewood, W.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-03-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-94
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W1998461335
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/applin/20.1.71
- The paper
- Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.1.71
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.