Cited by 163EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningCommunication in Education and HealthcareLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Silence in the Second Language Classrooms of Japanese Universities

King, Jim·2013·Applied Linguistics

Abstract

Japanese language learners’ proclivity for silence has been alluded to by various writers (e.g. Anderson 1993; Korst 1997; Greer 2000) and is supported by plenty of anecdotal evidence, but large-scale, empirical studies aimed at measuring the extent of macro-level silence within Japanese university L2 classrooms are notably lacking. This article responds to the gap in the literature by reporting on an extensive, multi-site study which used a structured observation methodology to investigate the classroom behaviour of 924 English language learners across nine universities. A total of 48 hours of data were collected using a minute-by-minute sampling strategy which resulted in some surprising results. Students were found to be responsible for less than one per cent of initiated talk within their classes, while over a fifth of all class time observed was characterized by no oral participation by any participants, staff, or students alike. These results are interpreted from a dynamic systems theory perspective, which suggests that silence emerges through multiple routes and has now formed a semi-permanent attractor state within the study’s L2 university classrooms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/applin/ams043

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Japanese students may be discomforted by demands for class interaction and will resist attempts to speak.

    “Such norms also extend to Japanese students who may be discomforted by demands for class interaction, and will, therefore, as King (2013) suggests, resist attempts to speak.”

    From 'In reality its almost impossible': CLT-oriented curriculum change (2015) · cites this paper as King 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
King, J.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
King, Jim
Venue
Applied Linguistics
Published
2012-09-29
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
325-343
ISSN
  • 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-450X
OpenAlex
W2086883187
Cited by
163
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 1
FWCI
78.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
classroom silence, second language classroom, Japanese language learners, English as a second language, dynamical systems theory, attractor states, classroom behavior, higher education language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review