Child Participant Roles in Applied Linguistics Research.
Abstract
Children’s status as research participants in applied linguistics has been largely overlooked even though unique methodological and ethical concerns arise in projects where children, rather than adults, are involved. This article examines the role of children as research participants in applied linguistics and discusses the limitations of traditional research ‘on’ and ‘about’ children, using research studies as examples published in mainstream applied linguistics journals. As neighbouring fields have already embraced a new approach to children as ‘active participants’, it is essential that SLA also widens its research agenda by focussing on children as active social agents who are capable of taking more responsible roles in research that concerns their own language learning. The last section of the article examines studies ‘with’ and ‘by’ children outside SLA in some detail and suggests future directions for research within SLA, based on the epistemology of plurality and on developing a dialogic relationship between adult facilitators and children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Little scholarly attention has been paid to teenage L2 learners in gaming and L2 learning research.
“Considering the importance of gaming to many young people and its potential for L2 learning, it is surprising that so little scholarly attention has been paid to this specific learner group (cf. Pinter, 2014).”
From Commercial-off-the-shelf games in the digital wild and L2 learner vocabulary (2019) · cites this paper as Pinter, 2014
Cites
Methodological Immaturity in Childhood Research?: Thinking through `participatory methods'
Gallacher, L.-A., & Gallagher, M. (2008) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/0907568208091672 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Commercial-off-the-shelf games in the digital wild and L2 learner vocabulary
Sundqvist, P. (2019) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44674 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“The researcher used an interview guide and offered the students a poster (describing typical English-mediated activities in the wild) to look at for inspiration, with the intention of foregrounding the students’ views, language use, and “individual stories” (Pinter, 2014, p. 172).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Pinter, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pinter, A.
- ORCID
- Pinter, A.
- Venue
- Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-06-18
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-183
- ISSN
- 0142-6001 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-450X
- OpenAlex
- W2172272034
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Linguistics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Keywords
- research with children, children's agency, research ethics with children, second language acquisition, child language acquisition, children's participation in research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review