Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 79Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivation for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Questionnaire (MOT-Q): Reliability, Factor Analysis, and Relationship to MMPI-2 Variables

Open access
Chervinsky, A. B., Ommaya, A. K., deJonge, M., Spector, J., Schwab, K., Salazar, A. M.·1998·Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract

A Likert scale questionnaire was developed to assess motivation for postacute rehabilitation by traumatic brain injury patients. Items were designed to reflect head-injured individuals' statements about their attitudes toward head injury rehabilitation. Factors such as denial of illness, anger, compliance with treatment, and medical information seeking behavior were used to assess unfavorable and favorable components of motivation. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha, which was found to be 0.91 for the total scale. Four factor analysis derived subscales were identified: Lack of Denial, Interest in Rehabilitation, Lack of Anger, and Reliance on Professional Help. Correlation and multiple regression analyses demonstrated moderate relationships between MOT-Q and several MMPI-2 variables largely related to indicators of somatic distress, depression and capacity for self-sufficiency. Lack of Denial subscale showed the strongest relationship to MMPI-2 of all MOT-Q variables, while Interest in Rehabilitation showed the best correlation to the MOT-Q total.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/arclin/13.5.433

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Damasio, A. R., & Anderson, S. W., (1993). The frontal lobes. In Heilman, K. M., & Valenstein. E. (Eds.). Clinical neuropsychology (pp. 409-460). New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Hesse, K., & Campion, E. (1983). Motivation the geriatric patient for rehabilitation. Journal of the American Geriat- rics Society, 7, 586-589.
  3. Ho ¨o ¨k, O. (1976). Neuropsychological aspects of motivation. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 8, 97-106.
  4. Miller, N. E. (1959). Liberalization of basic S-R concepts: extensions to conflict behavior, motivation, and social learning. In Koch, S. (Ed.). Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 2, pp. 196-202). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  5. Norusis. M. J. (1985). SPSSx advanced statistics guide. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Cited by

See all 79

Metadata

Authors
Chervinsky, A. B., Ommaya, A. K., deJonge, M., Spector, J., Schwab, K., & Salazar, A. M.
Affiliations
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Chervinsky, A. B.
Venue
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
1998-07-01
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
433-446
ISSN
  • 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-5843
OpenAlex
W4252375563
Cited by
79
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, rehabilitation motivation, post-acute rehabilitation, MMPI-2, denial of illness, anger, medication adherence, health information seeking, somatic distress, depression, self-sufficiency, questionnaire development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.