Cited by 245Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Serial MRI and neurobehavioural findings after mild to moderate closed head injury.

Open access
Levin, H S, Williams, D H, Eisenberg, H M, High, W M, Guinto, F C·1992·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

Fifty patients who sustained mild to moderate closed head injury (CHI) underwent a CT scan, MRI, and neurobehavioural testing. At baseline 40 patients had intracranial hyperintensities detected by MRI which predominated in the frontal and temporal regions, whereas 10 patients had lesions detected by CT. Neurobehavioural data obtained during the first admission to hospital disclosed no distinctive pattern in subgroups of patients characterised by lesions confined to the frontal, temporal, or frontotemporal regions, whereas all three groups exhibited pervasive deficits in relation to normal control subjects. The size of extraparenchymal lesion was significantly related to the initial Glasgow Coma Scale score, whereas this relation was not present in parenchymal lesions. One and three month follow up MRI findings showed substantial resolution of lesion while neuropsychological data reflected impressive recovery. The follow up data disclosed a trend from pervasive deficits to more specific impairments which were inconsistently related to the site of brain lesion. These results corroborate and extend previous findings, indicating that intracranial lesions detected by MRI are present in most patients hospitalised after mild to moderate CHI. Individual differences in the relation between site of lesion and the pattern of neuropsychological findings, which persist over one to three months after mild to moderate CHI, remain unexplained.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.55.4.255

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Bydder GM, Steiner RE, Young JR, et al. Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases. AJR 1982;139:215-36. · DOI
  2. Gandy SE, Snow RB, Zimmerman RD, et al. Cranial nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in head trauma. Ann Neurol 1984;16:254-7. · DOI
  3. Han JS, Kaufmnan B, Alfidi RJ, et al. Head trauma evaluated by magnetic resonance and computed tomography: a comparison. Radiology 1984;150:71-7. · DOI
  4. Jenkins A, Teasdale G, Hadley MDM, et al. Brain lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging in mild and severe head injuries. Lancet 1986;2:445-6. · DOI
  5. Wilson JTL, Wiedman KD, Hadley DM, Condon B, Teasdale G. Early and late magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological outcome after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:391-6. · DOI
  6. Kelly AB, Zimmerman RD, Snow RB, et al. Head trauma: comparison of MR and CT-experience in 100 patients. AJNR 1988;9:699-708.
  7. Snow RB, Zimmerman RD, Gandy SE, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the evaluation of head injury. Neurosurgery 1986;18:45-52. · DOI
  8. Levin HS, Amparo E, Eisenberg HM, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computerised tomography in relation to the neurobehavioral sequelae of mild and moderate head injuries. J Neurosurg 1987;66:706-13. · DOI
  9. Levin HS, Mattis S, Ruff RM, et al. Neurobehavioral outcome following minor head injury: a three-center study. J Neurosurg 1987;66:234-43. · DOI
  10. Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth JT, et al. Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurgery 1981;9:221-8.
  11. Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth IT, et al. Moderate head injury: completing the clinical spectrum of brain trauma. Neurosurg 1982;11:344-51.
  12. Levin HS, O'Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston orientation and amnesia test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis 1979;167:675-84. · DOI
  13. Adams JH, Graham D, Scott G, Parker LS, Doyle D. Brain damage in fatal non-missile head injury. J Clin Pathol 1980;33:1132-45. · DOI
  14. Holbourn AHS. Mechanics of head injuries. Lancet 1943;2:438-41. · DOI
  15. Nelson HE. A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 1976;12:313-24. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Benton AL. Differential effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia 1968;6:53-60. · DOI
  17. Jones-Gotman M, Milner B. Design fluency: the invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia 1977;15:653-74. · DOI
  18. Buschke H, Fuld P. Evaluating storage, retention, and retrieval in disordered memory and learning. Neurology 1974;24:1019-25. · DOI
  19. Levin HS, Larrabee GJ. Disproportionate decline in visuospatial memory in human aging. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1983;9:918 (abstract).
  20. Kimura D. Right temporal-lobe damage. Arch Neurol 1963;8:264-7 1.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Levin, H. S., Williams, D. H., Eisenberg, H. M., High, W. M., & Guinto, F. C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1992-04-01
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
255-262
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127966351
Cited by
245
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS021889)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
mild traumatic brain injury, closed head injury, serial MRI, neurobehavioral deficits, Glasgow Coma Scale, lesion resolution, neuropsychological recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Damage, Chronic, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Corpus Callosum, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Glasgow Coma Scale, Head Injuries, Closed, Neurocognitive Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review