The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spanish Multicenter Normative Studies (NEURONORMA Project): Methods and Sample Characteristics
Abstract
This paper describes the methods and sample characteristics of a series of Spanish normative studies (The NEURONORMA project). The primary objective of our research was to collect normative and psychometric information on a sample of people aged over 49 years. The normative information was based on a series of selected, but commonly used, neuropsychological tests covering attention, language, visuo-perceptual abilities, constructional tasks, memory, and executive functions. A sample of 356 community dwelling individuals was studied. Demographics, socio-cultural, and medical data were collected. Cognitive normality was validated via informants and a cognitive screening test. Norms were calculated for midpoint age groups. Effects of age, education, and sex were determined. The use of these norms should improve neuropsychological diagnostic accuracy in older Spanish subjects. These data may also be of considerable use for comparisons with other normative studies. Limitations of these normative data are also commented on.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Mayo's older Americans normative studies: updated AVLT norms for ages 56 to 97
Ivnik, R. J., Malec, J. F., Smith, G. E., Tangalos, E. G., Petersen, R. C., Kokmen, E., & Kurland, L. T. (1992) · Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854049208401880 · Cited by 310
Cited by
What did you do yesterday? A meta-analysis of sex differences in episodic memory.
Asperholm, M., Högman, N., Rafi, J., & Herlitz, A. (2019) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000197 · Cited by 182
Garcia‐Gutierrez, F., Delgado‐Alvarez, A., Delgado‐Alonso, C., Díaz‐Álvarez, J., Pytel, V., Valles‐Salgado, M., Gil, M. J., Hernández‐Lorenzo, L., Matías‐Guiu, J., Ayala, J. L., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.5667 · Cited by 56
Matias-Guiu, J. A., Díaz-Álvarez, J., Cuetos, F., Cabrera-Martín, M. N., Segovia-Ríos, I., Pytel, V., Moreno-Ramos, T., Carreras, J. L., Matías-Guiu, J., & Ayala, J. L. (2019) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.007 · Cited by 50
Reading prosody in the non-fluent and logopenic variants of primary progressive aphasia
Matias-Guiu, J. A., Suárez-Coalla, P., Pytel, V., Cabrera-Martín, M. N., Moreno-Ramos, T., Delgado-Alonso, C., Delgado-Álvarez, A., Matías-Guiu, J., & Cuetos, F. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.08.013 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Pena-Casanova, J., Blesa, R., Aguilar, M., Gramunt-Fombuena, N., Gomez-Anson, B., Oliva, R., Molinuevo, J. L., Robles, A., Barquero, M. S., Antunez, C., Martinez-Parra, C., Frank-Garcia, A., Fernandez, M., Alfonso, V., Sol, J. M., & for the NEURONORMA Study Team
- Venue
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-319
- ISSN
- 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-5843
- OpenAlex
- W2146131328
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
