Cited by 1,023Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcarePharmaceutical industry and healthcare

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Recommendations Guiding Physicians in Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects

Open access
RTCOG, RTCOG·1997·JAMA

Abstract

Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human SubjectsAdopted by the 18th WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, and amended by the:29th WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, Japan, October 197535th WMA General Assembly, Venice, Italy, October 198341 st WMA General Assembly, Hong Kong, September 198948th WMA General Assembly, Somerset West, Republic of South Africa, October 199652nd WMA General Assembly, Edinburgh, Scotland, October 2000Note of Clarification on Paragraph 29 added by the WMA General Assembly, Washing for 2002Note of Clarification on Paragraph 30 added by the WMA General Assembly, Tokyo, 2004

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1997.03540350075038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study protocol was approved by the Copernicus Group (Central Institutional Review Board) and is in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration; written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

    “The study protocol was approved by the Copernicus Group (Central Institutional Review Board) and is in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration (15). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.”
  • The procedure set out in this protocol, pertaining to the conduct, evaluation, and documentation of this trial, were designed to ensure that all persons involved in the trial abide by Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles described in the current revision of the Declaration of Helsinki.

    “The procedure set out in this protocol, pertaining to the conduct, evaluation, and documentation of this trial, were designed to ensure that all persons involved in the trial abide by Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles described in the current revision of the Declaration of Helsinki [30].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RTCOG, R.
Affiliations
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (TH)
Corresponding author
RTCOG, RTCOG
Venue
JAMA
Published
1997-03-19
Volume
277
Issue
11
Pages
925
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2634243099
Cited by
1,023
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 53
FWCI
17.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • Thai Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
Declaration of Helsinki, research ethics, informed consent, human subjects research, medical research ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review