The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues
Abstract
Despite its controversial history, intellectual assessment is an important part of a comprehensive psychoeducational or cognitive evaluation. Assessing intelligence offers insight into a test-taker's unique pattern of cognitive strengths and weaknesses and provides a psychometric basis for developing clinical hypotheses, recommendations, and treatment planning as part of a larger assessment protocol. This is why Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues (3rd ed.), edited by Drs Dawn P. Flanagan and Patti L. Harrison, will be a valuable resource for neuropsychologists conducting comprehensive evaluations. Furthermore, the book's scope, depth, and clarity will be useful to seasoned as well as more junior practitioners and graduate students. Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues (3rd ed.) is comprised of 36 chapters divided among six parts. The editors have selected authors with expertise in the theory, research, and practice of intellectual and cognitive assessment and with specialties in clinical psychology, neuropsychology, pediatrics, education, school psychology, developmental psychology applied psychometrics, and test publishing. While generally consistent with the scope of the second edition (Flanagan & Harrison, 2005), the third edition contains expanded content areas, updated research throughout, and several key improvements that will be appreciated by the reader, as detailed below.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
McGrew, K. S. (2009) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004 · Cited by 1,354
Confidence: A better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety?
Stankov, L., Lee, J., Luo, W., & Hogan, D. J. (2012) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.013 · Cited by 291
Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2013) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.05.004 · Cited by 247
Working Memory Capacity and Fluid Intelligence: Maintenance and Disengagement
Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., & Engle, R. W. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616650647 · Cited by 238
Metaphorically speaking: cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language
Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0258-5 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallo, J. L.
- Venue
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-04-25
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 507-508
- ISSN
- 0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-5843
- OpenAlex
- W2012626242
- Cited by
- 1,254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 112.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/arclin/act011
- The paper
- Gallo, J. L. (2013). Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.