Cited by 291Education, Achievement, and GiftednessPsychometric Methodologies and TestingInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Confidence: A better predictor of academic achievement than self-efficacy, self-concept and anxiety?

Stankov, Lazar, Lee, Jihyun, Luo, Wenshu, Hogan, David J.·2012·Learning and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.013

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stankov, L., Lee, J., Luo, W., & Hogan, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • National Institute of Education (SG)
Corresponding author
Stankov, Lazar
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
747-758
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019886670
Cited by
291
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
confidence, self-efficacy, self-concept, anxiety, academic performance, mathematics achievement, English achievement, 15-year-old students, individual differences, misconceptions, self-belief

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review