The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Point-Transect Surveys for Songbirds: Robust Methodologies
Open accessAbstract
Point-transect sampling is widely used for monitoring trends in abundance of songbirds. It is conceptualized as a “snapshot” method in which birds are “frozen” at a single location. With conventional methods, an observer records birds detected from a point for several minutes, during which birds may move around. This generates upward bias in the density estimate. I compared this conventional approach with two other approaches: in one, the observer records locations of detected birds at a snapshot moment; in the other, distances to detected cues (songbursts), rather than birds, are recorded. I implemented all three approaches, together with line-transect sampling and territory mapping in a survey of four bird species. The conventional method gave a biased estimate of density for one species. The snapshot method was found to be the most efficient of the point-sampling methods. Line-transect sampling proved more efficient than the point-sampling methods for all four species. This is likely to be generally true, provided that terrain and habitat allow easy use of a design with random transect lines. I concluded that the snapshot method is more appropriate than the conventional timed-count method for surveying songbirds. Although precision was rather poor with the cue-based method (partly because too few resources were devoted to cue rate estimation), it may be particularly useful for some single-species surveys. In addition, it is the only valid method for estimating abundance from surveys in which acoustic equipment is used to detect birds. Muestreos en Transectos Puntuales para Aves Canoras: Metodologías Robustas
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2011) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.1002/(issn)1938-5463a · Cited by 5,545
Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L., & Thomas, L. (2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198506492.001.0001 · Cited by 3,055
Self-citation(1992) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03531-4 · Cited by 2,991
Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Laake, J. L., Borchers, D. L., & Thomas, L. (2004) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198507833.001.0001 · Cited by 823
Self-citationLarge scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis
Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Simons, T. R., Farnsworth, G. L., Bailey, L. L., & Sauer, J. R. (2002) · Environmetrics · doi:10.1002/env.514 · Cited by 684
Regional landbird monitoring: perspectives from the Northern Rocky Mountains
Hutto, R. L., & Young, J. S. (2002) · Cited by 63
Cited by
Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics
Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Martin, S. W., Mellinger, D. K., Ward, J. A., Moretti, D. J., Harris, D., & Tyack, P. L. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12001 · Cited by 746
Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices
Buckland, S. T., Magurran, A. E., Green, R. E., & Fewster, R. M. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1589 · Cited by 403
Self-citationDesign and Analysis of Line Transect Surveys for Primates
Buckland, S. T., Plumptre, A. J., Thomas, L., & Rexstad, E. A. (2010) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-010-9431-5 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckland, S. T.
- Venue
- The Auk
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 345-357
- ISSN
- 0004-8038 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-4254
- OpenAlex
- W2180977432
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Point-Transect Surveys for Songbirds: Robust Methodologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/auk/123.2.345
- The paper
- Buckland, S. T. (2006). Point-Transect Surveys for Songbirds: Robust Methodologies. The Auk. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/123.2.345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.