Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structurally based plumage coloration is an honest signal of quality in male blue grosbeaks

Open access
Keyser, A. J.·2000·Behavioral Ecology

Abstract

We investigated the signaling function of blue plumage in male blue grosbeaks (Guiraca caerulea) to determine if structurally based coloration may act as a reliable signal of quality to conspecifics. Blue plumage results from the microstructure of feather barbules rather than from pigment granules, and thus it is possible that structurally based plumage ornaments may function differently from sexually selected ornamental coloration that is pigment based. The plumage of male blue grosbeaks reflects maximally in the blue-ultraviolet range, so most variation in plumage coloration among males is invisible to human observers. In previous research, we showed that increased area of blue plumage on the body is associated with a shift in the wavelength of maximum feather reflectance toward the ultraviolet and with high intensity of light reflected at that maximum, and that extreme expression of the male ornament is condition dependent. These observations suggest that blue plumage may be an honest advertisement of male quality. We tested this hypothesis in a wild population of blue grosbeaks. We quantified male quality in three broad categories. (1) Physical condition was assessed from subcutaneous fat deposits, ectoparasite load, and body size. (2) Territory quality was assessed from territory area, prey abundance, and predation risk. (3) Paternal investment was assessed from male feeding rate. We found that the bluest males have the largest body size, maintain the largest territories with the greatest prey abundance, and feed nestlings in the first nest of the season at the highest rates. We conclude that structurally based plumage coloration functions as an honest, intraspecific signal of quality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/beheco/11.2.202

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Keyser, A. J.
Venue
Behavioral Ecology
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
202-209
ISSN
  • 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7279
OpenAlex
W2052461044
Cited by
262
References
44
FWCI
21.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structurally based plumage coloration is an honest signal of quality in male blue grosbeaks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/beheco/11.2.202
The paper
Keyser, A. J. (2000). Structurally based plumage coloration is an honest signal of quality in male blue grosbeaks. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/11.2.202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.