Cited by 121Animal Behavior and Reproductionmelanin and skin pigmentationPhotonic Crystals and Applications

Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock

Loyau, Adeline, Gomez, Doris, Moureau, Benoît, Théry, Marc, Hart, Nathan S., Jalme, Michel Saint, Bennett, Andrew T.D., Sorci, Gabriele·2007·Behavioral Ecology

Abstract

Gaudy plumage coloration is a widespread ornamental trait in birds and thought to be sexually selected. Although much attention has been devoted to structural coloration reflecting in UV, the signaling function of structural colors lacking UV reflectance and those that exhibit iridescence coloration are poorly documented. The train of the peacock (Pavo cristatus), a classical example of a sexually selected trait, is composed of iridescent structurally colored eyespots not reflecting in UV. Until today, the role played by the structural color of the eyespots in female mate choice has never been investigated using spectrometry. We measured eyespot coloration from a stationary angle (static coloration) and the change in coloration resulting from different angles (iridescent coloration). We assessed coloration with reflectance spectrometry, and we analyzed reflectance spectra using 2 methods. First, we extracted the reflectance spectra shape descriptors hue, brightness, and chroma. Second, we computed color and brightness contrasts signaled by eyespot feathers, taking peafowl color visual sensitivity into account. Iridescence was estimated by the maximal change for all parameters. Brightness was correlated with male mating success. The maximal change in color contrast was correlated with both the frequency of male visitation by females and male mating success. These results suggest that peahens can use both static and dynamic (i.e., iridescent) aspects of plumage structural coloration as signals to detect and choose their mates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/beheco/arm088

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Loyau, A., Gomez, D., Moureau, B., Théry, M., Hart, N. S., Jalme, M. S., Bennett, A. T. D., & Sorci, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Behavioral Ecology
Published
2007-09-20
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1123-1131
ISSN
  • 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7279
OpenAlex
W2114804484
Cited by
121
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photonic Crystals and Applications
Keywords
iridescence, structural color, sexual selection, female mate choice, mating success, Pavo cristatus, plumage coloration, color contrast, brightness, ultraviolet reflectance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review