Cited by 219Animal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAvian ecology and behavior

Mate choice in lekking sage grouse revisited: the roles of vocal display, female site fidelity and copying

Gibson, Robert M., Bradbury, Jack W., Vehrencamp, Sandra L.·1991·Behavioral Ecology

Abstract

In lekking sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus), females exhibit relatively unanimous mate choice for particular males, but a satisfactory explanation for this unanimity has been elusive. We present analyses of mating distributions from two leks over 4 years that provide evidence for female choice based on differences in vocal display performance of males, the locations at which hens mated in the previous year, and the choices of other females (copying). The unanimity of female choice varied markedly among leks and years in correlation with changes in the mean numbers of hens that mated at the same time and hence the opportunity to copy. The results confirm that hens assess phenotypic traits of males directly but also indicate that the secondary tactics of site fidelity and copying are often important components of female choice. The occurrence of these secondary tactics has three implications: the variance in mating success among lek males will be a poor predictor of the intensity of sexual selection on specific traits; female preferences may generate more clustered dispersions of displaying males than predicted by hotspot settlement models; and direct assessment of males by females may be difficult or costly, a conclusion that supports adaptive models of sexual selection over a nonadaptive Fisherian process. [Behav Ecol 1991;2:165–180]

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/beheco/2.2.165

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Investigations of female sage grouse mate-choice have identified a number of spectral and temporal aspects of the strut display that are correlated with mating success.

    “Investigations of female sage grouse mate-choice have identified a number of spectral and temporal aspects of the strut display that are correlated with mating success (Gibson, 1996; Gibson and Bradbury, 1985; Gibson et al., 1991).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gibson, R. M., Bradbury, J. W., & Vehrencamp, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Behavioral Ecology
Published
1991
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
165-180
ISSN
  • 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7279
OpenAlex
W1974433848
Cited by
219
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
sage grouse, Centrocercus urophasianus, lek mating system, female mate choice, vocal display, copying behavior, mating success, sexual selection, phenotypic characterization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review