The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal
Abstract
We used DNA fingerprinting to determine paternity of 80 calves born into the individually monitored population of red deer (Cervus elaphus) on the Isle of Rum, Scotland. Using the paternity information, we investigated the assumptions and predictions of behavioral estimates of male mating success, on which previous studies in this population have relied. Over an 11- day interval in the rut centered on a female's estimated date of conception, the probability that a male fathers a calf is closely related to the number of days he holds the female in his harem, increasing from 0.12 for 1 day to 1.0 for 6 days or more. We compared three methods for estimating the reproductive success of individual males from field observations of harem membership with true success revealed by DNA fingerprinting. All three methods accurately identified the relative success of individual males but were poor predictors of absolute success: the behavioral methods underestimate the true success of successful males and overestimate the success of many males who, in fact, fail to father any calves. In consequence, variance in male mating success is greater than previous behavioral estimates for this population suggested. Both harem membership data and observations of mating and other estrous behavior can be used to identify males most likely to father a specific calf.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellite loci: a caution for parentage and population studies
PEMBERTON, J. M., SLATE, J., BANCROFT, D. R., & BARRETT, J. A. (1995) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00214.x · Cited by 664
Self-citationWild pedigrees: the way forward
Pemberton, J. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1531 · Cited by 406
Self-citationChapter 5 Empirical Evidence of Density‐Dependence in Populations of Large Herbivores
Bonenfant, C., Gaillard, J., Coulson, T., Festa‐Bianchet, M., Loison, A., Garel, M., Loe, L. E., Blanchard, P., Pettorelli, N., Owen‐Smith, N., et al. (2009) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(09)00405-x · Cited by 400
Age-dependent sexual selection in bighorn rams
Coltman, D. W., Festa-Bianchet, M., Jorgenson, J. T., & Strobeck, C. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1851 · Cited by 356
Male dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii.
Wroblewski, E. E., Murray, C. M., Keele, B. F., Schumacher-Stankey, J. C., Hahn, B. H., & Pusey, A. E. (2009) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.014 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Pemberton, J. M., Albon, S. D., Guinness, F. E., Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Dover, G. A.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-75
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W1997254554
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/beheco/3.1.66
- The paper
- Pemberton, J. M., Albon, S. D., Guinness, F. E., Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Dover, G. A. (1992). Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/3.1.66
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.