The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity
Abstract
In theories of mate choice that rely on genetic benefits, the nature of the“good genes“ involved has received little attention. A review of genetic studies of mate choice in a variety of species and situations suggests that individual heterozygosity is more important than previously realized. Females are predicted to value heterozygosity in their offspring and under some conditions in their males. The expression of vigor, condition-sensitive ornaments, and symmetry in males may be a direct reflection not of “good genes“ but of individual heterozygosity at key loci or at many loci. Like sexuality itself, mate choice based on heterozygosity and genic diversity may be an adaptation that favors the production of diverse and superior competitors. Female choice is made meaningful by sexuality, and the adaptive value of choice probably depends on some of the same factors that maintain sexuality
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
(2017) · Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man · doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7 · Cited by 9,510
Mate selection—A selection for a handicap
Zahavi, A. (1975) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 · Cited by 5,251
Heritable True Fitness and Bright Birds: A Role for Parasites?
Hamilton, W. D., & Zuk, M. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7123238 · Cited by 3,733
Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap
Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285346 · Cited by 2,799
Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought
Williams, G. C. (2008) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · doi:10.1515/9781400820108 · Cited by 2,762
Common West African HLA antigens are associated with protection from severe malaria
Hill, A. V. S., Allsopp, C. E. M., Kwiatkowski, D., Anstey, N. M., Twumasi, P., Rowe, P. A., Bennett, S., Brewster, D., McMichael, A. J., & Greenwood, B. M. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/352595a0 · Cited by 1,552
Sex versus Non-Sex versus Parasite
Hamilton, W. D. (1980) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544435 · Cited by 1,368
SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE
Kirkpatrick, M. (1982) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05003.x · Cited by 1,171
Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences
Birkhead, T. R., & Møller, A. P. (1992) · Cited by 1,115
Cited by
Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review
Tregenza, T., & Wedell, N. (2000) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00964.x · Cited by 958
Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits
JENNIONS, M. D., & PETRIE, M. (2000) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1999.tb00040.x · Cited by 554
Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings
Foerster, K., Delhey, K., Johnsen, A., Lifjeld, J. T., & Kempenaers, B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01969 · Cited by 531
Wedekind, C., & Füri, S. (1997) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0204 · Cited by 494
Major histocompatibility complex genes, symmetry, and body scent attractiveness in men and women
Thornhill, R. (2003) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arg043 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. L.
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-65
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2168358609
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 15.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/beheco/8.1.60
- The paper
- Brown, J. L. (1997). A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/8.1.60
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.