Cryptic female choice by female control of oviposition timing in a soldier fly
Abstract
There is substantial evidence that cryptic female choice (CFC) is present in numerous taxa. Several mechanisms have been proposed for CFC; however, we only have experimental evidence for a few of them. Female control of oviposition timing is a potentially widespread mechanism of CFC, but it has never been experimentally demonstrated. The aims of this study are to test 2 critical predictions of the hypothesis that CFC through control of oviposition timing occurs in the soldier fly Merosargus cingulatus: 1) to determine if M. cingulatus females are less likely to oviposit immediately after mating when the male does not perform copulatory courtship than when he does and 2) to determine if failure to immediately oviposit by the female results in lower reproductive success for the male she just mated with. To answer the first question, I compared the oviposition behavior of females that mated with control males versus females that mated with manipulated males that could not perform copulatory courtship. I showed that M. cingulatus females fail to oviposit immediately after copulation when males do not perform copulatory courtship. To answer the second question, I showed that there is last male sperm precedence in M. cingulatus. Because the last male to mate fertilizes most of the female's eggs, a male will benefit when females oviposit immediately after mating with him and before remating with another male.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retention duration, sperm viability and selective sperm use suggest potential for cryptic female choice in BSF, as described in other stratiomyids.
“Retention duration, sperm viability and selective sperm use suggest potential for cryptic female choice as described in other stratiomyids (Barbosa 2009, 2011, 2012, 2015).”
From Beyond the Black Box: Reproductive Strategies of the Black Soldier Fly as a Model for Bridging Evolutionary Biology and Applied Entomology (2026) · cites this paper as Barbosa 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Males responding to sperm competition cues have higher fertilization success in a soldier fly
Barbosa, F. (2012) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/ars035 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationLemke, N. B., & Puniamoorthy, N. (2026) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.70249 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Retention duration, sperm viability and selective sperm use suggest potential for cryptic female choice as described in other stratiomyids (Barbosa 2009, 2011, 2012, 2015).”
- Authors
- Barbosa, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barbosa, Flavia
- ORCID
- Barbosa, Flavia
- Venue
- Behavioral Ecology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 957-960
- ISSN
- 1045-2249 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7279
- OpenAlex
- W2111293282
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavioral Ecology (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- cryptic female choice, oviposition timing, Stratiomyidae, last-male sperm precedence, female remating, male reproductive success, sperm competition, mating behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review