The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AlgPred 2.0: an improved method for predicting allergenic proteins and mapping of IgE epitopes
Open accessAbstract
AlgPred 2.0 is a web server developed for predicting allergenic proteins and allergenic regions in a protein. It is an updated version of AlgPred developed in 2006. The dataset used for training, testing and validation consists of 10 075 allergens and 10 075 non-allergens. In addition, 10 451 experimentally validated immunoglobulin E (IgE) epitopes were used to identify antigenic regions in a protein. All models were trained on 80% of data called training dataset, and the performance of models was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation technique. The performance of the final model trained on the training dataset was evaluated on 20% of data called validation dataset; no two proteins in any two sets have more than 40% similarity. First, a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) search has been performed against the dataset, and allergens were predicted based on the level of similarity with known allergens. Second, IgE epitopes obtained from the IEDB database were searched in the dataset to predict allergens based on their presence in a protein. Third, motif-based approaches like multiple EM for motif elicitation/motif alignment and search tool have been used to predict allergens. Fourth, allergen prediction models have been developed using a wide range of machine learning techniques. Finally, the ensemble approach has been used for predicting allergenic protein by combining prediction scores of different approaches. Our best model achieved maximum performance in terms of area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.98 with Matthew’s correlation coefficient 0.85 on the validation dataset. A web server AlgPred 2.0 has been developed that allows the prediction of allergens, mapping of IgE epitope, motif search and BLAST search (https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/algpred2/).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
BLAST+: architecture and applications
Camacho, C., Coulouris, G., Avagyan, V., Ma, N., Papadopoulos, J., Bealer, K., & Madden, T. L. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 · Cited by 22,074
Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences
Li, W., & Godzik, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · Cited by 11,410
UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase
Apweiler, R. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh131 · Cited by 7,498
Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers.
Bailey, T. L., & Elkan, C. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 4,982
The global burden of asthma: executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee Report
Masoli, M., Fabian, D., Holt, S., Beasley, R., & Program, G. I. F. A. (. (2004) · Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00526.x · Cited by 3,529
Burks, A. W., James, J. M., & Eigenmann, P. (1951) · Cited by 2,562
The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB): 2018 update
Vita, R., Mahajan, S., Overton, J. A., Dhanda, S. K., Martini, S., Cantrell, J. R., Wheeler, D. K., Sette, A., & Peters, B. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1006 · Cited by 2,186
UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase
UniProt Consortium, T. (2018) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky092 · Cited by 2,020
AllerTOP v.2—a server for in silico prediction of allergens
Dimitrov, I., Bangov, I., Flower, D. R., & Doytchinova, I. (2014) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s00894-014-2278-5 · Cited by 1,475
Cited by
A deep learning-based method for the prediction of DNA interacting residues in a protein
Patiyal, S., Dhall, A., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac322 · Cited by 38
Self-citationRecent Advances in Studying Toll-like Receptors with the Use of Computational Methods
Bzówka, M., Bagrowska, W., & Góra, A. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00419 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, N., Patiyal, S., Dhall, A., Pande, A., Arora, C., & Raghava, G. P. S.
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-11-17
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- OpenAlex
- W3101256226
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AlgPred 2.0: an improved method for predicting allergenic proteins and mapping of IgE epitopes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bib/bbaa294
- The paper
- Sharma, N., Patiyal, S., Dhall, A., Pande, A., Arora, C., & Raghava, G. P. S. (2021). AlgPred 2.0: an improved method for predicting allergenic proteins and mapping of IgE epitopes. Briefings in Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbaa294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.