The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepImmuno: deep learning-empowered prediction and generation of immunogenic peptides for T-cell immunity
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Cytolytic T-cells play an essential role in the adaptive immune system by seeking out, binding and killing cells that present foreign antigens on their surface. An improved understanding of T-cell immunity will greatly aid in the development of new cancer immunotherapies and vaccines for life-threatening pathogens. Central to the design of such targeted therapies are computational methods to predict non-native peptides to elicit a T-cell response, however, we currently lack accurate immunogenicity inference methods. Another challenge is the ability to accurately simulate immunogenic peptides for specific human leukocyte antigen alleles, for both synthetic biological applications, and to augment real training datasets. Here, we propose a beta-binomial distribution approach to derive peptide immunogenic potential from sequence alone. We conducted systematic benchmarking of five traditional machine learning (ElasticNet, K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, Random Forest and AdaBoost) and three deep learning models (convolutional neural network (CNN), Residual Net and graph neural network) using three independent prior validated immunogenic peptide collections (dengue virus, cancer neoantigen and SARS-CoV-2). We chose the CNN as the best prediction model, based on its adaptivity for small and large datasets and performance relative to existing methods. In addition to outperforming two highly used immunogenicity prediction algorithms, DeepImmuno-CNN correctly predicts which residues are most important for T-cell antigen recognition and predicts novel impacts of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our independent generative adversarial network (GAN) approach, DeepImmuno-GAN, was further able to accurately simulate immunogenic peptides with physicochemical properties and immunogenicity predictions similar to that of real antigens. We provide DeepImmuno-CNN as source code and an easy-to-use web interface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Improved training of Wasserstein GANs
Gulrajani, I., Ahmed, F., Arjovsky, M., Dumoulin, V., & Courville, A. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.00028 · Cited by 6,800
Recent advances in convolutional neural networks
Gu, J., Wang, Z., Kuen, J., Ma, L., Shahroudy, A., Shuai, B., Liu, T., Wang, X., Wang, G., Cai, J., et al. (2018) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.10.013 · Cited by 6,576
Saito, T., & Rehmsmeier, M. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118432 · Cited by 5,309
Shortcut learning in deep neural networks
Geirhos, R., Jacobsen, J.-H., Michaelis, C., Zemel, R., Brendel, W., Bethge, M., & Wichmann, F. A. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-00257-z · Cited by 2,224
Prospective mapping of viral mutations that escape antibodies used to treat COVID-19
Starr, T. N., Greaney, A. J., Addetia, A., Hannon, W. W., Choudhary, M. C., Dingens, A. S., Li, J. Z., & Bloom, J. D. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf9302 · Cited by 743 · cited 1×
“To understand how evolving mutations in SARS-CoV-2 may enhance viral transmission, we compared DeepImmuno-CNN predictions in these variants [25–27].”
Wells, D. K., van Buuren, M. M., Dang, K. K., Hubbard-Lucey, V. M., Sheehan, K. C. F., Campbell, K. M., Lamb, A., Ward, J. P., Sidney, J., Blazquez, A. B., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.015 · Cited by 538
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Nelde, 2020, SARS-CoV-2-derived peptides define heterologous and COVID-19-induced T cell recognition, Nat Immunol, 22, 74, 10.1038/s41590-020-00808-x · DOI · Paper page
- Joglekar, 2020, Li G. T cell antigen discovery, Nat Methods, 7, 1
- Tang, 2017, neoantigenR: an annotation based pipeline for tumor neoantigen identification from sequencing data, 10.1101/171843 · DOI
- Mei, 2020, A comprehensive review and performance evaluation of bioinformatics tools for HLA class I peptide-binding prediction, Brief Bioinform, 21, 1119, 10.1093/bib/bbz051 · DOI
- Calis, 2013, Properties of MHC class I presented peptides that enhance immunogenicity, PLoS Comput Biol, 9, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003266 · DOI
- Frankiw, 2019, Alternative mRNA splicing in cancer immunotherapy, Nat Rev Immunol, 19, 675, 10.1038/s41577-019-0195-7 · DOI
- Tung, 2007, POPI: predicting immunogenicity of MHC class I binding peptides by mining informative physicochemical properties, Bioinformatics, 23, 942, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm061 · DOI
- Tung, 2011, POPISK: T-cell reactivity prediction using support vector machines and string kernels, BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 446, 10.1186/1471-2105-12-446 · DOI
- Saethang, 2013, PAAQD: predicting immunogenicity of MHC class I binding peptides using amino acid pairwise contact potentials and quantum topological molecular similarity descriptors, J Immunol Methods, 387, 293, 10.1016/j.jim.2012.09.016 · DOI
- Kim, 2018, Neopepsee: accurate genome-level prediction of neoantigens by harnessing sequence and amino acid immunogenicity information, Ann Oncol, 29, 1030, 10.1093/annonc/mdy022 · DOI
- Wang, 2020, INeo-Epp: a novel T-cell HLA class-I immunogenicity or neoantigenic epitope prediction method based on sequence-related amino acid features, Biomed Res Int, 5798356, 2020
- Wu, 2019, DeepHLApan: a deep learning approach for neoantigen prediction considering both HLA-peptide binding and immunogenicity, Front Immunol, 10, 2559, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02559 · DOI
- Kingma, 2014, Semi-supervised learning with deep generative models, Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst, 27, 3581
- Jin, 2020, Generative adversarial network technologies and applications in computer vision, Comput Intell Neurosci, 2020, 1459107, 10.1155/2020/1459107 · DOI
- Gupta, 2019, Feedback GAN for DNA optimizes protein functions, Nat Mach Intell, 1, 105, 10.1038/s42256-019-0017-4 · DOI
- Kawashima, 2007, AAindex: amino acid index database, progress report 2008, Nucleic Acids Res, 36, D202, 10.1093/nar/gkm998 · DOI
- Cerda, 2018, Similarity encoding for learning with dirty categorical variables, Mach Learn, 107, 1477, 10.1007/s10994-018-5724-2 · DOI
- Nielsen, 2007, NetMHCpan, a method for quantitative predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-A and -B locus protein of known sequence, PLoS One, 2, e796, 10.1371/journal.pone.0000796 · DOI
- Weiskopf, 2013, Comprehensive analysis of dengue virus-specific responses supports an HLA-linked protective role for CD8+ T cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110, E2046, 10.1073/pnas.1305227110 · DOI
- Hou, 2020, SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant exhibits efficient replication ex vivo and transmission in vivo, Science, 370, 1464, 10.1126/science.abe8499 · DOI · Paper page
- Starr, 2020, Deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain reveals constraints on folding and ACE2 binding, Cell, 182, 1295, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.012 · DOI · Paper page
- Wucherpfennig, 2009, Structural alterations in peptide-MHC recognition by self-reactive T cell receptors, Curr Opin Immunol, 21, 590, 10.1016/j.coi.2009.07.008 · DOI
- Rudolph, 2006, How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors, Annu Rev Immunol, 24, 419, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115658 · DOI
- Wu, 2020, Structural basis for oligoclonal T cell recognition of a shared p53 cancer neoantigen, Nat Commun, 11, 2908, 10.1038/s41467-020-16755-y · DOI
- Hu, 2019, ACME: pan-specific peptide-MHC class I binding prediction through attention-based deep neural networks, Bioinformatics, 35, 4946, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz427 · DOI
- Kearns-Jonker, 2007, Use of molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis to define the structural basis for the immune response to carbohydrate xenoantigens, BMC Immunol, 8, 1
- O’Donnell, 2020, MHCflurry 2.0: improved Pan-allele prediction of MHC class I-presented peptides by incorporating antigen processing, Cell Syst, 11, 418, 10.1016/j.cels.2020.09.001 · DOI
- Prachar, 2020, Identification and validation of 174 COVID-19 vaccine candidate epitopes reveals low performance of common epitope prediction tools, Sci Rep, 10, 1, 10.1038/s41598-020-77466-4 · DOI
- Alipanahi, 2015, Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning, Nat Biotechnol, 33, 831, 10.1038/nbt.3300 · DOI · Paper page
- Pan, 2018, Predicting RNA-protein binding sites and motifs through combining local and global deep convolutional neural networks, Bioinformatics, 34, 3427, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty364 · DOI
- Gowthaman, 2019, TCR3d: the T cell receptor structural repertoire database, Bioinformatics, 35, 5323, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz517 · DOI
- Bagaev, 2020, VDJdb in 2019: database extension, new analysis infrastructure and a T-cell receptor motif compendium, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, D1057, 10.1093/nar/gkz874 · DOI
- Azizi, 2018, Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the breast tumor microenvironment, Cell, 174, 1293, 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.060 · DOI · Paper page
- Vieyra-Lobato, 2018, Description of CD8 regulatory T lymphocytes and their specific intervention in graft-versus-host and infectious diseases, autoimmunity, and cancer, J Immunol Res, 3758713, 2018
- De Boer, 1994, T cell repertoires and competitive exclusion, J Theor Biol, 169, 375, 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1160 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, G., Iyer, B., Prasath, V. B. S., Ni, Y., & Salomonis, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Cincinnati (US)
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Guangyuan
- Venue
- Briefings in Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-05-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-4054
- PMC
- PMC8135853
- OpenAlex
- W3159295432
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R01CA226802)
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Research Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Keywords
- T cell immunity, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, HLA alleles, beta-binomial distribution, convolutional neural networks, generative adversarial networks, synthetic peptide design, neoantigens, SARS-CoV-2 variants, dengue virus, vaccine design, cancer immunotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review