Cited by 168vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DeepImmuno: deep learning-empowered prediction and generation of immunogenic peptides for T-cell immunity

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cytolytic T-cells play an essential role in the adaptive immune system by seeking out, binding and killing cells that present foreign antigens on their surface. An improved understanding of T-cell immunity will greatly aid in the development of new cancer immunotherapies and vaccines for life-threatening pathogens. Central to the design of such targeted therapies are computational methods to predict non-native peptides to elicit a T-cell response, however, we currently lack accurate immunogenicity inference methods. Another challenge is the ability to accurately simulate immunogenic peptides for specific human leukocyte antigen alleles, for both synthetic biological applications, and to augment real training datasets. Here, we propose a beta-binomial distribution approach to derive peptide immunogenic potential from sequence alone. We conducted systematic benchmarking of five traditional machine learning (ElasticNet, K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, Random Forest and AdaBoost) and three deep learning models (convolutional neural network (CNN), Residual Net and graph neural network) using three independent prior validated immunogenic peptide collections (dengue virus, cancer neoantigen and SARS-CoV-2). We chose the CNN as the best prediction model, based on its adaptivity for small and large datasets and performance relative to existing methods. In addition to outperforming two highly used immunogenicity prediction algorithms, DeepImmuno-CNN correctly predicts which residues are most important for T-cell antigen recognition and predicts novel impacts of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Our independent generative adversarial network (GAN) approach, DeepImmuno-GAN, was further able to accurately simulate immunogenic peptides with physicochemical properties and immunogenicity predictions similar to that of real antigens. We provide DeepImmuno-CNN as source code and an easy-to-use web interface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbab160

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Nelde, 2020, SARS-CoV-2-derived peptides define heterologous and COVID-19-induced T cell recognition, Nat Immunol, 22, 74, 10.1038/s41590-020-00808-x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Joglekar, 2020, Li G. T cell antigen discovery, Nat Methods, 7, 1
  3. Tang, 2017, neoantigenR: an annotation based pipeline for tumor neoantigen identification from sequencing data, 10.1101/171843 · DOI
  4. Mei, 2020, A comprehensive review and performance evaluation of bioinformatics tools for HLA class I peptide-binding prediction, Brief Bioinform, 21, 1119, 10.1093/bib/bbz051 · DOI
  5. Calis, 2013, Properties of MHC class I presented peptides that enhance immunogenicity, PLoS Comput Biol, 9, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003266 · DOI
  6. Frankiw, 2019, Alternative mRNA splicing in cancer immunotherapy, Nat Rev Immunol, 19, 675, 10.1038/s41577-019-0195-7 · DOI
  7. Tung, 2007, POPI: predicting immunogenicity of MHC class I binding peptides by mining informative physicochemical properties, Bioinformatics, 23, 942, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm061 · DOI
  8. Tung, 2011, POPISK: T-cell reactivity prediction using support vector machines and string kernels, BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 446, 10.1186/1471-2105-12-446 · DOI
  9. Saethang, 2013, PAAQD: predicting immunogenicity of MHC class I binding peptides using amino acid pairwise contact potentials and quantum topological molecular similarity descriptors, J Immunol Methods, 387, 293, 10.1016/j.jim.2012.09.016 · DOI
  10. Kim, 2018, Neopepsee: accurate genome-level prediction of neoantigens by harnessing sequence and amino acid immunogenicity information, Ann Oncol, 29, 1030, 10.1093/annonc/mdy022 · DOI
  11. Wang, 2020, INeo-Epp: a novel T-cell HLA class-I immunogenicity or neoantigenic epitope prediction method based on sequence-related amino acid features, Biomed Res Int, 5798356, 2020
  12. Wu, 2019, DeepHLApan: a deep learning approach for neoantigen prediction considering both HLA-peptide binding and immunogenicity, Front Immunol, 10, 2559, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02559 · DOI
  13. Kingma, 2014, Semi-supervised learning with deep generative models, Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst, 27, 3581
  14. Jin, 2020, Generative adversarial network technologies and applications in computer vision, Comput Intell Neurosci, 2020, 1459107, 10.1155/2020/1459107 · DOI
  15. Gupta, 2019, Feedback GAN for DNA optimizes protein functions, Nat Mach Intell, 1, 105, 10.1038/s42256-019-0017-4 · DOI
  16. Kawashima, 2007, AAindex: amino acid index database, progress report 2008, Nucleic Acids Res, 36, D202, 10.1093/nar/gkm998 · DOI
  17. Cerda, 2018, Similarity encoding for learning with dirty categorical variables, Mach Learn, 107, 1477, 10.1007/s10994-018-5724-2 · DOI
  18. Nielsen, 2007, NetMHCpan, a method for quantitative predictions of peptide binding to any HLA-A and -B locus protein of known sequence, PLoS One, 2, e796, 10.1371/journal.pone.0000796 · DOI
  19. Weiskopf, 2013, Comprehensive analysis of dengue virus-specific responses supports an HLA-linked protective role for CD8+ T cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 110, E2046, 10.1073/pnas.1305227110 · DOI
  20. Hou, 2020, SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant exhibits efficient replication ex vivo and transmission in vivo, Science, 370, 1464, 10.1126/science.abe8499 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Starr, 2020, Deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain reveals constraints on folding and ACE2 binding, Cell, 182, 1295, 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.012 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wucherpfennig, 2009, Structural alterations in peptide-MHC recognition by self-reactive T cell receptors, Curr Opin Immunol, 21, 590, 10.1016/j.coi.2009.07.008 · DOI
  23. Rudolph, 2006, How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors, Annu Rev Immunol, 24, 419, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115658 · DOI
  24. Wu, 2020, Structural basis for oligoclonal T cell recognition of a shared p53 cancer neoantigen, Nat Commun, 11, 2908, 10.1038/s41467-020-16755-y · DOI
  25. Hu, 2019, ACME: pan-specific peptide-MHC class I binding prediction through attention-based deep neural networks, Bioinformatics, 35, 4946, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz427 · DOI
  26. Kearns-Jonker, 2007, Use of molecular modeling and site-directed mutagenesis to define the structural basis for the immune response to carbohydrate xenoantigens, BMC Immunol, 8, 1
  27. O’Donnell, 2020, MHCflurry 2.0: improved Pan-allele prediction of MHC class I-presented peptides by incorporating antigen processing, Cell Syst, 11, 418, 10.1016/j.cels.2020.09.001 · DOI
  28. Prachar, 2020, Identification and validation of 174 COVID-19 vaccine candidate epitopes reveals low performance of common epitope prediction tools, Sci Rep, 10, 1, 10.1038/s41598-020-77466-4 · DOI
  29. Alipanahi, 2015, Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning, Nat Biotechnol, 33, 831, 10.1038/nbt.3300 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Pan, 2018, Predicting RNA-protein binding sites and motifs through combining local and global deep convolutional neural networks, Bioinformatics, 34, 3427, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty364 · DOI
  31. Gowthaman, 2019, TCR3d: the T cell receptor structural repertoire database, Bioinformatics, 35, 5323, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz517 · DOI
  32. Bagaev, 2020, VDJdb in 2019: database extension, new analysis infrastructure and a T-cell receptor motif compendium, Nucleic Acids Res, 48, D1057, 10.1093/nar/gkz874 · DOI
  33. Azizi, 2018, Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the breast tumor microenvironment, Cell, 174, 1293, 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.060 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Vieyra-Lobato, 2018, Description of CD8 regulatory T lymphocytes and their specific intervention in graft-versus-host and infectious diseases, autoimmunity, and cancer, J Immunol Res, 3758713, 2018
  35. De Boer, 1994, T cell repertoires and competitive exclusion, J Theor Biol, 169, 375, 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1160 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Li, G., Iyer, B., Prasath, V. B. S., Ni, Y., & Salomonis, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Guangyuan
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2021-05-03
Volume
22
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W3159295432
Cited by
168
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5
FWCI
6.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01CA226802)
  • Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Keywords
T cell immunity, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, HLA alleles, beta-binomial distribution, convolutional neural networks, generative adversarial networks, synthetic peptide design, neoantigens, SARS-CoV-2 variants, dengue virus, vaccine design, cancer immunotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review