Cited by 11Genomics and Rare DiseasesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SHINE: protein language model-based pathogenicity prediction for short inframe insertion and deletion variants

Open access
Fan, Xiao, Pan, Hongbing, Tian, Alan, Chung, Wendy K, Shen, Yufeng·2023·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Accurate variant pathogenicity predictions are important in genetic studies of human diseases. Inframe insertion and deletion variants (indels) alter protein sequence and length, but not as deleterious as frameshift indels. Inframe indel Interpretation is challenging due to limitations in the available number of known pathogenic variants for training. Existing prediction methods largely use manually encoded features including conservation, protein structure and function, and allele frequency to infer variant pathogenicity. Recent advances in deep learning modeling of protein sequences and structures provide an opportunity to improve the representation of salient features based on large numbers of protein sequences. We developed a new pathogenicity predictor for SHort Inframe iNsertion and dEletion (SHINE). SHINE uses pretrained protein language models to construct a latent representation of an indel and its protein context from protein sequences and multiple protein sequence alignments, and feeds the latent representation into supervised machine learning models for pathogenicity prediction. We curated training data from ClinVar and gnomAD, and created two test datasets from different sources. SHINE achieved better prediction performance than existing methods for both deletion and insertion variants in these two test datasets. Our work suggests that unsupervised protein language models can provide valuable information about proteins, and new methods based on these models can improve variant interpretation in genetic analyses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbac584

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Backman, 2021, Exome sequencing and analysis of 454,787 UK biobank participants, Nature, 599, 628, 10.1038/s41586-021-04103-z · DOI
  2. Radford, 2022, Saturation genome editing of DDX3X clarifies pathogenicity of germline and somatic variation, 10.1101/2022.06.10.22276179 · DOI
  3. Mills, 2006, An initial map of insertion and deletion (INDEL) variation in the human genome, Genome Res, 16, 1182, 10.1101/gr.4565806 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Berning, 2019, In-frame indel mutations in the genome of the blind Mexican Cavefish, Astyanax mexicanus, Genome Biol Evol, 11, 2563, 10.1093/gbe/evz180 · DOI
  5. Sergouniotis, 2016, The role of small in-frame insertions/deletions in inherited eye disorders and how structural modelling can help estimate their pathogenicity, Orphanet J Rare Dis, 11, 125, 10.1186/s13023-016-0505-0 · DOI
  6. Landrum, 2018, ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence, Nucleic Acids Res, 46, D1062, 10.1093/nar/gkx1153 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hu, 2013, SIFT Indel: predictions for the functional effects of amino acid insertions/deletions in proteins, PLoS One, 8
  8. Zhao, 2013, DDIG-in: discriminating between disease-associated and neutral non-frameshifting micro-indels, Genome Biol, 14, R23, 10.1186/gb-2013-14-3-r23 · DOI
  9. Bermejo-Das-Neves, 2014, A comprehensive study of small non-frameshift insertions/deletions in proteins and prediction of their phenotypic effects by a machine learning method (KD4i), BMC Bioinf, 15, 111, 10.1186/1471-2105-15-111 · DOI
  10. Zhang, 2015, Discriminating between deleterious and neutral non-frameshifting indels based on protein interaction networks and hybrid properties, Mol Genet Genomics, 290, 343, 10.1007/s00438-014-0922-5 · DOI
  11. Douville, 2016, Assessing the pathogenicity of insertion and deletion variants with the variant effect scoring tool (VEST-Indel), Hum Mutat, 37, 28, 10.1002/humu.22911 · DOI
  12. Velde, 2017, GAVIN: gene-aware variant INterpretation for medical sequencing, Genome Biol, 18, 6, 10.1186/s13059-016-1141-7 · DOI
  13. Pagel, 2019, Pathogenicity and functional impact of non-frameshifting insertion/deletion variation in the human genome, PLoS Comput Biol, 15, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007112 · DOI
  14. Rentzsch, 2019, CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, D886, 10.1093/nar/gky1016 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Li, 2020, CAPICE: a computational method for consequence-agnostic pathogenicity interpretation of clinical exome variations, Genome Med, 12, 75, 10.1186/s13073-020-00775-w · DOI
  16. Rives, 2021, Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences, Proc Natl Acad Sci, 118, 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Meier, 2021, Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function, 10.1101/2021.07.09.450648 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Zhou, Integrating de novo and inherited variants in 42,607 autism cases identifies mutations in new moderate-risk genes, 10.1038/s41588-022-01148-2 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Kaplanis, 2020, Evidence for 28 genetic disorders discovered by combining healthcare and research data, Nature, 586, 757, 10.1038/s41586-020-2832-5 · DOI · Paper page
  20. pfeliciano@simonsfoundation.org SCEa, Consortium S, 2018, SPARK: a US cohort of 50,000 families to accelerate autism research, Neuron, 97, 488, 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.015 · DOI
  21. Feliciano, 2019, Exome sequencing of 457 autism families recruited online provides evidence for autism risk genes, NPJ Genom Med, 4, 19, 10.1038/s41525-019-0093-8 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Chang, 2018, Accelerating discovery of functional mutant alleles in cancer, Cancer Discov, 8, 174, 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0321 · DOI
  23. Rao, 2021, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 8844
  24. Pedregosa, 2011, Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python, J Mach Learn Res, 12, 2825

Metadata

Authors
Fan, X., Pan, H., Tian, A., Chung, W. K., & Shen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Lynbrook High School , San Jose, CA , USA
Corresponding author
  • Fan, Xiao
  • Chung, Wendy K
  • Shen, Yufeng
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2022-12-28
Volume
24
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W4312214411
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (K99HG011490, R01GM120609)
  • Columbia University Precision Medicine Joint Pilot Grants Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
variant pathogenicity prediction, protein language models, latent representations, multiple sequence alignment, ClinVar, gnomAD, variant interpretation, protein sequence modeling
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Gene Frequency, Humans, Proteins, Virulence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review