Cited by 7Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Enhanced compound-protein binding affinity prediction by representing protein multimodal information via a coevolutionary strategy

Open access
Guo, Binjie, Zheng, Hanyu, Jiang, Haohan, Li, Xiaodan, Guan, Naiyu, Zuo, Yanming, Zhang, Yicheng, Yang, Hengfu +1 more·2023·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Due to the lack of a method to efficiently represent the multimodal information of a protein, including its structure and sequence information, predicting compound-protein binding affinity (CPA) still suffers from low accuracy when applying machine-learning methods. To overcome this limitation, in a novel end-to-end architecture (named FeatNN), we develop a coevolutionary strategy to jointly represent the structure and sequence features of proteins and ultimately optimize the mathematical models for predicting CPA. Furthermore, from the perspective of data-driven approach, we proposed a rational method that can utilize both high- and low-quality databases to optimize the accuracy and generalization ability of FeatNN in CPA prediction tasks. Notably, we visually interpret the feature interaction process between sequence and structure in the rationally designed architecture. As a result, FeatNN considerably outperforms the state-of-the-art (SOTA) baseline in virtual drug evaluation tasks, indicating the feasibility of this approach for practical use. FeatNN provides an outstanding method for higher CPA prediction accuracy and better generalization ability by efficiently representing multimodal information of proteins via a coevolutionary strategy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbac628

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Guo, B., Zheng, H., Jiang, H., Li, X., Guan, N., Zuo, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, H., & Wang, X.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Hunan First Normal University (CN)
  • Nantong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xuhua
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2023-01-22
Volume
24
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W4317703003
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (K20210195)
  • Leading Innovative and Entrepreneur Team Introduction Program of Zhejiang (2019R01007)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR20H090002)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971866)
  • The Scientific and Technological Innovation 2030 Program of China (2021ZD0200408)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
feature interaction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Models, Theoretical, Protein Binding, Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review