Cited by 5RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesProtein Structure and Dynamics

LinAliFold and CentroidLinAliFold: fast RNA consensus secondary structure prediction for aligned sequences using beam search methods

Open access
Fukunaga, Tsukasa, Hamada, Michiaki·2022·Bioinformatics Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: RNA consensus secondary structure prediction from aligned sequences is a powerful approach for improving the secondary structure prediction accuracy. However, because the computational complexities of conventional prediction tools scale with the cube of the alignment lengths, their application to long RNA sequences, such as viral RNAs or long non-coding RNAs, requires significant computational time. Results: In this study, we developed LinAliFold and CentroidLinAliFold, fast RNA consensus secondary structure prediction tools based on minimum free energy and maximum expected accuracy principles, respectively. We achieved software acceleration using beam search methods that were successfully used for fast secondary structure prediction from a single RNA sequence. Benchmark analyses showed that LinAliFold and CentroidLinAliFold were much faster than the existing methods while preserving the prediction accuracy. As an empirical application, we predicted the consensus secondary structure of coronaviruses with approximately 30 000 nt in 5 and 79 min by LinAliFold and CentroidLinAliFold, respectively. We confirmed that the predicted consensus secondary structure of coronaviruses was consistent with the experimental results. Availability and implementation: The source codes of LinAliFold and CentroidLinAliFold are freely available at https://github.com/fukunagatsu/LinAliFold-CentroidLinAliFold. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioadv/vbac078

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Fukunaga, T., & Hamada, M.
Affiliations
Waseda University (JP)
Corresponding author
Fukunaga, Tsukasa
Venue
Bioinformatics Advances
Published
2022-01-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
vbac078-vbac078
ISSN
2635-0041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307137870
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP19K20395, JP20H05582, JP22H04891)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
beam search, minimum free energy, computational efficiency, long non-coding RNA, viral RNA, RNA secondary structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review