Cited by 4Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

AlphaCRV: a pipeline for identifying accurate binder topologies in mass-modeling with AlphaFold

Open access
Guzmán-Vega, Francisco J, Arold, Stefan T·2024·Bioinformatics Advances

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: The speed and accuracy of deep learning-based structure prediction algorithms make it now possible to perform in silico “pull-downs” to identify protein–protein interactions on a proteome-wide scale. However, on such a large scale, existing scoring algorithms are often insufficient to discriminate biologically relevant interactions from false positives. Results: Here, we introduce AlphaCRV, a Python package that helps identify correct interactors in a one-against-many AlphaFold screen by clustering, ranking, and visualizing conserved binding topologies, based on protein sequence and fold. Availability and implementation: AlphaCRV is a Python package for Linux, freely available at https://github.com/strubelab/AlphaCRV

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioadv/vbae131

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Guzmán-Vega, F. J., & Arold, S. T.
Affiliations
  • Biological and Environmental Science and Engineering Division, Computational Biology Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology , Thuwal 23955-6900,
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Corresponding author
Arold, Stefan T
Venue
Bioinformatics Advances
Published
2024
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
vbae131-vbae131
ISSN
2635-0041 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402582206
Cited by
4
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (FCC/1/1976-33 and REI/1/4446-01)
  • Office of Sponsored Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, AlphaFold, mass modeling, protein-protein interaction network, clustering, protein structure prediction, false positive reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review