The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human attitudes towards animals in relation to species similarity to humans: a multivariate approach
Abstract
Human attitudes towards animals are becoming of increasing importance in the areas of conservation and welfare. It has long been taken for granted that our attitudes are influenced by the degree of biological or behavioural similarity between a given species and ourselves. This research investigates whether there is a link between bio-behavioural similarity to humans and preferences for animal species that are obtained when subjects view a set of 40 pictures illustrating a wide diversity of animals. Extensive data regarding the natural history, behaviour and physiology of 40 species of animals from a wide range of taxonomic groups were collected. Bio-behavioural similarity between animal species and humans was formed on the basis of multidimensional analyses, including factors such as size, weight and lifespan among the physical attributes, and reproductive strategy, parental investment and social organization among the behavioural traits. It was found that a clear relationship between similarity and preference exists, suggesting that humans are predisposed to liking species on the basis of shared bio-behavioural traits. These results imply that efforts made in the conservation and welfare of species may be biased more by anthropocentric views than has been previously recognized. It may be important for a new approach to be taken when it comes to determining the targets of conservation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Humans tend to prefer animals that are phylogenetically close to them and perceived as physically, behaviorally or cognitively similar; these aspects trigger more positive affect and attachment and caregiving behaviors, as well as greater empathy and a higher concern in terms of welfare and conservation [52,53,54,55,56,57].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cites
Public perceptions of predators, particularly the wolf and coyote
Kellert, S. R. (1985) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(85)90047-3 · Cited by 315
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 1998, CONS BIOL, 12, 1103, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97253.x · DOI
- 2006, 35, 361
- 2008, 28, 94, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, CONS BIOL, 7, 845, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x · DOI
- Butter, 1993, 49, 11, 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00918.x · DOI
- Beatson, 2007, The British journal of social psychology / the British Psychological Society, 46, 619, 10.1348/014466606X147753 · DOI
- 1999, 55, 729, 10.1111/0022-4537.00144 · DOI
- 2002, SOC ANIMALS, 10, 267, 10.1163/156853002320770074 · DOI
- 2004, EVOL PSYCHOL, 2, 177
- Arndt, 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology, 83, 26, 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.26 · DOI · Paper page
- 2003, SOC ANIMALS, 11, 83, 10.1163/156853003321618864 · DOI · Paper page
- 1998, CONS BIOL, 12, 1408, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97402.x · DOI
- 2008, Animal Behaviour, 75, 745, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.004 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Batt, S.
- Venue
- Bioscience Horizons
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-04-21
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-190
- ISSN
- 1754-7431
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review