The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anthropomorphism and Anthropomorphic Selection—Beyond the "Cute Response"
Abstract
This article explores the origin and evolutionary implications of anthropomorphism in the context of our relationships with animal companions. On the human side, anthropomorphic thinking enables animal companions' social behavior to be construed in human terms, thereby allowing these nonhuman animals to function for their human owners or guardians as providers of nonhuman social support. Absence of social support is known to be detrimental to human health and well being. Therefore, anthropomorphism and its corollary, pet keeping, have obvious biological fitness implications. On the animal side, anthropomorphism constitutes a unique evolutionary selection pressure, analogous to sexual selection, which has molded the appearance, anatomy, and behavior of companion animal species so as to adapt them to their unusual ecological niche as social support providers. Although such species undoubtedly have benefited numerically from the effects of this process, the consequences of anthropomorphism are less benign when viewed from the perspective of individual animals. Indeed, anthropomorphic selection probably is responsible for some of the more severe welfare problems currently found in companion animals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a link between anthropomorphism, empathy, and attachment towards nonhuman agents, particularly animals.
“there is a link between anthropomorphism, empathy and attachment towards nonhuman agents, particularly animals [13,103,212].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [103]
Functional levels of empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism may promote people's concern for animal welfare in general and foster healthy human-animal relationships.
“Functional levels of empathy, attachment and anthropomorphism may promote people’s concern for animal welfare in general and foster healthy human–animal relationships [103,104,105,106].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [103]
The tendency to anthropomorphize can promote positive relationships with animals, favoring attachment and empathy towards them.
“The tendency to anthropomorphize can promote positive relationships with animals, favoring attachment and empathy towards them [103,104,246].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [103]
Anthropomorphism has either positive or negative effects on human-animal relationships and animal well-being.
“Anthropomorphism has either positive or negative effects on human–animal relationships and animal well-being [69,103,104,221].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [103]
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Social Relationships and Health
House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3399889 · Cited by 7,073
Mate selection—A selection for a handicap
Zahavi, A. (1975) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3 · Cited by 5,251
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020240 · Cited by 587
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Animal-Assisted Therapy in the Treatment of Substance Dependence
Wesley, M. C., Minatrea, N. B., & Watson, J. C. (2009) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/175303709x434167 · Cited by 111
Harrison, M. A., & Hall, A. E. (2010) · Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0099303 · Cited by 102
Seeing Dogs: Human Preferences for Dog Physical Attributes
Hecht, J., & Horowitz, A. (2015) · Anthrozoös · doi:10.2752/089279315x14129350722217 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Serpell, J.
- Venue
- Society & Animals
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-100
- ISSN
- 1063-1119
- 1568-5306
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review