The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Predicting the secondary structure of a protein (alpha-helix, beta-sheet, coil) is an important step towards elucidating its three-dimensional structure, as well as its function. Presently, the best predictors are based on machine learning approaches, in particular neural network architectures with a fixed, and relatively short, input window of amino acids, centered at the prediction site. Although a fixed small window avoids overfitting problems, it does not permit capturing variable long-rang information. Results: We introduce a family of novel architectures which can learn to make predictions based on variable ranges of dependencies. These architectures extend recurrent neural networks, introducing non-causal bidirectional dynamics to capture both upstream and downstream information. The prediction algorithm is completed by the use of mixtures of estimators that leverage evolutionary information, expressed in terms of multiple alignments, both at the input and output levels. While our system currently achieves an overall performance close to 76% correct prediction – at least comparable to the best existing systems – the main emphasis here is on the development of new algorithmic ideas. Availability: The executable program for predicting protein secondary structure is available from the authors free of charge. Contact: pfbaldi@ics.uci.edu, gpollast@ics.uci.edu, brunak@cbs.dtu.dk, paolo@dsi.unifi.it
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks
Graves, A. (2012) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2 · Cited by 3,120
Bidirectional LSTM Networks for Improved Phoneme Classification and Recognition
Graves, A., Fernández, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (2005) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11550907_126 · Cited by 925
Deep Learning in Drug Discovery
Gawehn, E., Hiss, J. A., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201501008 · Cited by 723
Neural Network for Graphs: A Contextual Constructive Approach
Micheli, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2008.2010350 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldi, P., Brunak, S., Frasconi, P., Soda, G., & Pollastri, G.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 937-946
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2134299061
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/15.11.937
- The paper
- Baldi, P., Brunak, S., Frasconi, P., Soda, G., & Pollastri, G. (1999). Exploiting the past and the future in protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/15.11.937
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.