Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automated genome sequence analysis and annotation.

Andrade, M A, Brown, N P, Leroy, C, Hoersch, S, de Daruvar, A, Reich, C, Franchini, A, Tamames, J, Valencia, A, Ouzounis, C, Sander, C·1999·Bioinformatics

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Large-scale genome projects generate a rapidly increasing number of sequences, most of them biochemically uncharacterized. Research in bioinformatics contributes to the development of methods for the computational characterization of these sequences. However, the installation and application of these methods require experience and are time consuming. RESULTS: We present here an automatic system for preliminary functional annotation of protein sequences that has been applied to the analysis of sets of sequences from complete genomes, both to refine overall performance and to make new discoveries comparable to those made by human experts. The GeneQuiz system includes a Web-based browser that allows examination of the evidence leading to an automatic annotation and offers additional information, views of the results, and links to biological databases that complement the automatic analysis. System structure and operating principles concerning the use of multiple sequence databases, underlying sequence analysis tools, lexical analyses of database annotations and decision criteria for functional assignments are detailed. The system makes automatic quality assessments of results based on prior experience with the underlying sequence analysis tools; overall error rates in functional assignment are estimated at 2.5-5% for cases annotated with highest reliability ('clear' cases). Sources of over-interpretation of results are discussed with proposals for improvement. A conservative definition for reporting 'new findings' that takes account of database maturity is presented along with examples of possible kinds of discoveries (new function, family and superfamily) made by the system. System performance in relation to sequence database coverage, database dynamics and database search methods is analysed, demonstrating the inherent advantages of an integrated automatic approach using multiple databases and search methods applied in an objective and repeatable manner. AVAILABILITY: The GeneQuiz system is publicly available for analysis of protein sequences through a Web server at http://www.sander.ebi.ac. uk/gqsrv/submit

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.5.391

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Andrade, M. A., Brown, N. P., Leroy, C., Hoersch, S., de Daruvar, A., Reich, C., Franchini, A., Tamames, J., Valencia, A., Ouzounis, C., & Sander, C.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
1999-05-01
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
391-412
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W1975796937
Cited by
198
References
2
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automated genome sequence analysis and annotation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/15.5.391
The paper
Andrade, M. A., Brown, N. P., Leroy, C., Hoersch, S., de Daruvar, A., Reich, C., Franchini, A., Tamames, J., Valencia, A., Ouzounis, C., & Sander, C. (1999). Automated genome sequence analysis and annotation. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/15.5.391

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.