The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genetic control of flower morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a logical analysis.
Open accessAbstract
MOTIVATION: A large number of molecular mechanisms at the basis of gene regulation have been described during the last few decades. It is now becoming possible to address questions dealing with both the structure and the dynamics of genetic regulatory networks, at least in the case of some of the best-characterized organisms. Most recent attempts to address these questions deal with microbial or animal model systems. In contrast, we analyze here a gene network involved in the control of the morphogenesis of flowers in a model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. RESULTS: The genetic control of flower morphogenesis in Arabidopsis involves a large number of genes, of which 10 are considered here. The network topology has been derived from published genetic and molecular data, mainly relying on mRNA expression patterns under wild-type and mutant backgrounds. Using a 'generalized logical formalism', we provide a qualitative model and derive the parameter constraints accounting for the different patterns of gene expression found in the four floral organs of Arabidopsis (sepals, petals, stamens and carpels), plus a 'non-floral' state. This model also allows the simulation or the prediction of various mutant phenotypes. On the basis of our model analysis, we predict the existence of a sixth stable pattern of gene expression, yet to be characterized experimentally. Moreover, our dynamical analysis leads to the prediction of at least one more regulator of the gene LFY, likely to be involved in the transition from the non-flowering state to the flowering pathways. Finally, this work, together with other theoretical and experimental considerations, leads us to propose some general conclusions about the structure of gene networks controlling development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Boolean network models of cellular regulation: prospects and limitations
Bornholdt, S. (2008) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0132.focus · Cited by 394
Qualitative simulation of genetic regulatory networks using piecewise-linear models
DEJONG, H., GOUZE, J., HERNANDEZ, C., PAGE, M., SARI, T., & GEISELMANN, J. (2004) · Bulletin of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.bulm.2003.08.010 · Cited by 386
A Logical Model Provides Insights into T Cell Receptor Signaling
Saez-Rodriguez, J., Simeoni, L., Lindquist, J. A., Hemenway, R., Bommhardt, U., Arndt, B., Haus, U.-U., Weismantel, R., Gilles, E. D., Klamt, S., et al. (2007) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030163 · Cited by 352
Alvarez-Buylla, E. R., Benítez, M., Corvera-Poiré, A., Chaos Cador, Á., de Folter, S., Gamboa de Buen, A., Garay-Arroyo, A., García-Ponce, B., Jaimes-Miranda, F., Pérez-Ruiz, R. V., et al. (2010) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0127 · Cited by 298
Self-citationThomas, R., & Kaufman, M. (2001) · Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.1349893 · Cited by 242
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendoza, L., Thieffry, D., & Alvarez-Buylla, E. R.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-07-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 593-606
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2065546165
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic control of flower morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a logical analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/15.7.593
- The paper
- Mendoza, L., Thieffry, D., & Alvarez-Buylla, E. R. (1999). Genetic control of flower morphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a logical analysis. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/15.7.593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.