Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,114

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sister-Scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences

Gibbs, Mark J., Armstrong, John S., Gibbs, Adrian J.·2000·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: To devise a method that, unlike available methods, directly measures variations in phylogenetic signals in gene sequences that result from recombination, tests the significance of the signal variations and distinguishes misleading signals. Results: We have developed a method, that we call ‘sister-scanning’, for assessing phylogenetic and compositional signals in the various patterns of identity that occur between four nucleotide sequences. A Monte Carlo randomization is done for all columns (positions) within a window and \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(Z\) \end{document}-scores are obtained for four real sequences or three real sequences with an outlier that is also randomized. The usefulness of the approach is demonstrated using tobamovirus and luteovirus sequences. Contradictory phylogenetic signals were distinguished in both datasets, as were regions of sequence that contained no clear signal or potentially misleading signals related to compositional similarities. In the tobamovirus dataset, contradictory phylogenetic signals were separated by coding sequences up to a kilobase long that contained no clear signal. Our re-analysis of this dataset using sister-scanning also yielded the first evidence known to us of an inter-species recombination site within a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene together with evidence of an unusual pattern of conservation in the three codon positions. Availability: A program package, SiScan, for use under MS-DOS can be downloaded from http://life.anu.edu.au/with test data and instructions. Contact: mgibbs@rsbs.anu.edu.au; johna@rsbs.anu.edu.au; gibbs@rsbs.anu.edu.au * To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.7.573

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,114

Metadata

Authors
Gibbs, M. J., Armstrong, J. S., & Gibbs, A. J.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
573-582
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2143119188
Cited by
1,114
References
2
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sister-Scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/16.7.573
The paper
Gibbs, M. J., Armstrong, J. S., & Gibbs, A. J. (2000). Sister-Scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/16.7.573

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.