Cited by 279RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesRNA Research and Splicing

Secondary structure alone is generally not statistically significant for the detection of noncoding RNAs

Open access
Rivas, Elena, Eddy, Sean R.·2000·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Several results in the literature suggest that biologically interesting RNAs have secondary structures that are more stable than expected by chance. Based on these observations, we developed a scanning algorithm for detecting noncoding RNA genes in genome sequences, using a fully probabilistic version of the Zuker minimum-energy folding algorithm. Results: Preliminary results were encouraging, but certain anomalies led us to do a carefully controlled investigation of this class of methods. Ultimately, our results argue that for the probabilistic model there is indeed a statistical effect, but it comes mostly from local base-composition bias and not from RNA secondary structure. For the thermodynamic implementation (which evaluates statistical significance by doing Monte Carlo shuffling in fixed-length sequence windows, thus eliminating the base-composition effect) the signals for noncoding RNAs are still usually indistinguishable from noise, especially when certain statistical artifacts resulting from local base-composition inhomogeneity are taken into account. We conclude that although a distinct, stable secondary structure is undoubtedly important in most noncoding RNAs, the stability of most noncoding RNA secondary structures is not sufficiently different from the predicted stability of a random sequence to be useful as a general genefinding approach. Contact: eddy@genetics.wustl.edu * To whom correspondence should be addressed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.7.583

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compositional bias toward GC-rich sequences may be a reasonable criterion for identifying non-coding RNAs in the genome due to the effect on folding stability.

    “For example, compositional bias toward GC-rich sequences may be a reasonable criterion for identifying non-coding RNAs in the genome due to the effect on folding stability (67)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Le,S.-Y., Chen,J.-H. and Maizel,J. (1990) Efficient searches for unusual folding regions in RNA sequences. In Sarma,R.H. and Sarma,M.H. (eds), Structure and Methods: Human Genome Initiative and DNA Recombination, Vol 1, Adenine Press, pp. 127-136.
  2. Nilsen,T.W. (1998) RNA-RNA interactions in nuclear pre-mRNA. In Simon,R. and Grunberg-Manago,M. (eds), RNA Structure and Function Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp. 279-307.
  3. Zimmerman,R.A. and Dahlberg,A.E. (1996) Ribosomal RNA. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rivas, E., & Eddy, S. R.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
583-605
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2088938573
Cited by
279
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (HG01363, R01HG001363)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
RNA secondary structure, RNA folding, statistical significance, base composition bias
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Base Composition, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Nucleic Acid Conformation, RNA, Models, Statistical, Methanococcus, Caenorhabditis elegans, RNA, Helminth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review