The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A probabilistic method for identifying start codons in bacterial genomes
Abstract
As the pace of genome sequencing has accelerated, the need for highly accurate gene prediction systems has grown. Computational systems for identifying genes in prokaryotic genomes have sensitivities of 98–99% or higher (Delcher et al. , Nucleic Acids Res. , 27, 4636–4641, 1999). These accuracy figures are calculated by comparing the locations of verified stop codons to the predictions. Determining the accuracy of start codon prediction is more problematic, however, due to the relatively small number of start sites that have been confirmed by independent, non-computational methods. Nonetheless, the accuracy of gene finders at predicting the exact gene boundaries at both the 5′ and 3′ ends of genes is of critical importance for microbial genome annotation, especially in light of the important signaling information that is sometimes found on the 5′ end of a protein coding region. In this paper we propose a probabilistic method to improve the accuracy of gene identification systems at finding precise translation start sites. The new system, RBSfinder, is tested on a validated set of genes from Escherichia coli , for which it improves the accuracy of start site locations predicted by computational gene finding systems from the range 67–77% to 90% correct. * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Takeuchi, F., Watanabe, S., Baba, T., Yuzawa, H., Ito, T., Morimoto, Y., Kuroda, M., Cui, L., Takahashi, M., Ankai, A., et al. (2005) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.187.21.7292-7308.2005 · Cited by 331
Heinl, S., Wibberg, D., Eikmeyer, F., Szczepanowski, R., Blom, J., Linke, B., Goesmann, A., Grabherr, R., Schwab, H., Pühler, A., et al. (2012) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.007 · Cited by 102
Genome Sequence of a Salmonella Phage Used To Control Salmonella Transmission in Swine
Zhang, J., Hong, Y., Harman, N. J., Das, A., & Ebner, P. D. (2014) · Genome Announcements · doi:10.1128/genomea.00521-14 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Suzek, B. E., Ermolaeva, M. D., Schreiber, M., & Salzberg, S. L.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1123-1130
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2168846269
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A probabilistic method for identifying start codons in bacterial genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1123
- The paper
- Suzek, B. E., Ermolaeva, M. D., Schreiber, M., & Salzberg, S. L. (2001). A probabilistic method for identifying start codons in bacterial genomes. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.