The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells
Abstract
Motivation: Assessment of protein subcellular location is crucial to proteomics efforts since localization information provides a context for a protein’s sequence, structure, and function. The work described below is the first to address the subcellular localization of proteins in a quantitative, comprehensive manner. Results: Images for ten different subcellular patterns (including all major organelles) were collected using fluorescence microscopy. The patterns were described using a variety of numeric features, including Zernike moments, Haralick texture features, and a set of new features developed specifically for this purpose. To test the usefulness of these features, they were used to train a neural network classifier. The classifier was able to correctly recognize an average of 83% of previously unseen cells showing one of the ten patterns. The same classifier was then used to recognize previously unseen sets of homogeneously prepared cells with 98% accuracy. Availability: Algorithms were implemented using the commercial products Matlab, S-Plus, and SAS, as well as some functions written in C. The scripts and source code generated for this work are available at http://murphylab.web.cmu.edu/software. Contact: murphy@cmu.edu * To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators
Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., & White, H. (1989) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 · Cited by 21,728
Cited by
Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference?
Altschuler, S. J., & Wu, L. F. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.033 · Cited by 1,214
Handcrafted vs. non-handcrafted features for computer vision classification
Nanni, L., Ghidoni, S., & Brahnam, S. (2017) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2017.05.025 · Cited by 542
Barr, A. R., Cooper, S., Heldt, F. S., Butera, F., Stoy, H., Mansfeld, J., Novák, B., & Bakal, C. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14728 · Cited by 403
Machine learning in bioinformatics: A brief survey and recommendations for practitioners
Bhaskar, H., Hoyle, D. C., & Singh, S. (2006) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.09.002 · Cited by 109
A multi-scale map of cell structure fusing protein images and interactions
Qin, Y., Huttlin, E. L., Winsnes, C. F., Gosztyla, M. L., Wacheul, L., Kelly, M. R., Blue, S. M., Zheng, F., Chen, M., Schaffer, L. V., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04115-9 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Boland, M. V., & Murphy, R. F.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1213-1223
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2145752049
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1213
- The paper
- Boland, M. V., & Murphy, R. F. (2001). A neural network classifier capable of recognizing the patterns of all major subcellular structures in fluorescence microscope images of HeLa cells. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.