Cited by 1,214Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsCell Image Analysis Techniques

Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference?

Open access
Altschuler, Steven J., Wu, Lani F.·2010·Cell

Abstract

A central challenge of biology is to understand how individual cells process information and respond to perturbations. Much of our knowledge is based on ensemble measurements. However, cell-to-cell differences are always present to some degree in any cell population, and the ensemble behaviors of a population may not represent the behaviors of any individual cell. Here, we discuss examples of when heterogeneity cannot be ignored and describe practical strategies for analyzing and interpreting cellular heterogeneity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.033

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even cells of the same type can exhibit substantial heterogeneity, reflecting finer sub-types, regulated functional variation, or inherent stochasticity.

    “even cells of the same ‘type’ can exhibit substantial heterogeneity, reflecting finer sub-types, regulated functional variation, or inherent stochasticity1–6”
  • Differences in regenerative potential between stem cells are traditionally viewed as the result of differences in the characteristics of stable cell phenotypes.

    “These differences in regenerative potential between stem cells are traditionally viewed as the result of differences in the characteristics of stable cell phenotypes (Altschuler and Wu, 2010; Blau et al., 2015; Chakkalakal et al., 2012).”

    From Aging induces aberrant state transition kinetics in murine muscle stem cells (2020) · cites this paper as Altschuler and Wu, 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Duda RO Hart PE Stork DG Pattern Classification 2001 Interscience Wiley 2 edn

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altschuler, S. J., & Wu, L. F.
Affiliations
Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Altschuler, Steven J.
  • Wu, Lani F.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
141
Issue
4
Pages
559-563
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974934611
Cited by
1,214
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 32
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM081549, R01GM085442)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
cellular heterogeneity, cell-to-cell variability, single-cell analysis, perturbation response
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Cells, Cytological Techniques, Drosophila

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review